Orphan works

Orphan works

An orphan work is a [1] A work can become orphaned through rightsholders being unaware of their holding, or by their demise (e.g. deceased persons or defunct companies) and establishing inheritance has proved impracticable.[2] In other cases, comprehensively diligent research fails to determine any authors, creators or originators for a work.


  • Extent 1
  • Impact 2
  • Causes 3
  • Specifics by country 4
    • United Kingdom 4.1
    • United States 4.2
    • Canada 4.3
    • European Union 4.4
    • Other nations 4.5
  • See also 5
  • References 6


Several Wikimedia chapters are working on a (European) lobby on Intellectual Property legislation and regulations. This discussion tried to reach out to the community what is going on, discuss the objectives in this lobby and the participants were asked to give input on what issues are important, forgotten or not interesting at all.

Precise figures of orphan works are not readily available, even though libraries, archives and museums hold a vast number of them. In April 2009, a study estimated that the collections of public sector organisations in the UK hold about 25 million orphan works.[2] Examples of orphan works include photographs that do not note the photographer, such as photos from scientific expeditions and historical images, old folk music recordings, little known novels and other literature.[1] Software which became an orphaned work is usually known as abandonware.


Orphan works are not available for legal use by filmmakers, archivists, writers, musicians, and broadcasters. Because rightsholders cannot be identified and located in order to obtain permission, historical and cultural records such as period film footage, photographs, and sound recordings cannot be legally incorporated in contemporary works (unless the incorporation qualifies as [1]


According to Neil Netanel the increase in orphan works is the result of two factors: (1) that copyright terms have been lengthened, and (2) that copyright is automatically conferred without registration or renewal.[3] Currently only a fraction of old copyrighted works is available to the public. Netanel argues that rightsholders have "no incentive to maintain a work in circulation" or otherwise make their out-of-print content available unless they can hope to earn more money doing so than by producing new works or engaging in more lucrative activities.[3]

Specifics by country

United Kingdom

On the 29th October 2014 the Intellectual Property Office launched an online licensing scheme for orphan works.[4][5]

United States

See Orphan works in the United States.


Canada has created a supplemental licensing scheme, under Section 77 of its Copyright Act, that allows licenses for the use of published works to be issued by the Copyright Board of Canada on behalf of unlocatable rightsholders, after a prospective licensor has made "reasonable efforts to locate [holders of] copyright".[6] As of August 2008, the Board had issued 226 such licenses,[7] and denied 7 applications.[8]

European Union

The European Commission, the civil branch of the European Union, created a report on Digital Preservation of Orphan Works and Out-of-Print Works.[9]

The European Commission also brought an arbitration against the United States in the World Trade Organization for the US violation of the Berne Convention with the passing of the Fairness in Music Licensing Act. The United States lost the arbitration and is currently paying undisclosed reparations to the WTO.[10]

On June 4, 2008 European representatives of museums, libraries, archives, audiovisual archives and rightsholders signed a Memorandum of Understanding,[11] an orphan works legislation supported by rightsholders. It will help cultural institutions to digitize books, films and music whose authors are unknown, making them available to the public online.[9] In 2009 the Strategic Content Alliance and the Collections Trust published a report[2] on the scope and impact of orphan works and their effect on the delivery of web services to the public.

In October 2012 the European Union adopted Directive 2012/28/EU on Orphan Works.[12]

Other nations

Similar to Canada, Hungary,[13] India,[14] Japan,[15] Saudi Arabia,[16] and South Korea[17] have established state licensing options for orphan works.

See also


  1. ^ a b c
  2. ^ a b c
  3. ^ a b c d
  4. ^
  5. ^ "Millions of unseen 'orphan' artworks to be put on show" by Adam Sherwin, The Independent, 29 October 2014
  6. ^
  7. ^
  8. ^
  9. ^ a b
  10. ^ http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/1234da.pdf
  11. ^
  12. ^
  13. ^ 1999. évi LXXVI törvény a szerzői jogról (Act LXXVI of 1999 on Copyright), §§ 41/A-41/K (Hung.).
  14. ^ Art. 31a, Indian Copyright Act.
  15. ^ Art. 67, Japanese Copyright Act.
  16. ^ Art. 16, Copyright Act of Saudi Arabia.
  17. ^ South Korean Copyright Act, Art. 47.