Tux the penguin, mascot of Linux
Linux kernel 3.0.0 booting
|Developer||Linus Torvalds and thousands of collaborators|
|Written in||C, assembly|
|Initial release||0.01 (17 September 1991)|
|Latest release||3.18 (7 December 2014) |
|License||GPL v2 plus various closed source binary blobs|
The Linux kernel is a Unix-like computer operating system kernel. The Linux kernel is the most widely used operating system kernel in the world; the Linux operating system is based on it and deployed on both traditional computer systems, usually in the form of Linux distributions, and on embedded devices such as routers. The Android operating system for tablet computers and smartphones is also based atop the Linux kernel.
The Linux kernel was initially conceived and created in 1991 by Finnish computer science student Linus Torvalds, for his personal computer and with no cross-platform intentions, but has since expanded to support a huge array of computer architectures, more than any other operating system or kernel. Linux rapidly attracted developers and users who adapted code from other free software projects for use with the new operating system. The Linux kernel has received contributions from thousands of programmers.
The Linux kernel API, the application programming interface (API) through which user programs interact with the kernel, is meant to be very stable and to not break userspace programs (some programs, such as those with GUIs, rely on other APIs as well). As part of the kernel's functionality, device drivers control the hardware; "mainlined" device drivers are also meant to be very stable. However, the interface between the kernel and loadable kernel modules (LKMs), unlike in many other kernels and operating systems, is not meant to be very stable by design.
The Linux kernel, developed by contributors worldwide, is a prominent example of free and open source software. Day-to-day development discussions take place on the Linux kernel mailing list (LKML). The Linux kernel is released under the GNU General Public License version 2 (GPLv2), with some firmware images released under various non-free licenses.
- Tanenbaum–Torvalds debate 1.1
- Popularity 1.2
Legal aspects 2
Licensing terms 2.1
- GPL version 3 2.1.1
Loadable kernel modules 2.2
- Kernel modules 2.2.1
- Firmware binary blobs 2.3
- Trademark 2.4
- SCO litigation 2.5
- Licensing terms 2.1
- Programming language 3.1
- Compiler compatibility 3.2
- Kernel-to-userspace API 3.3.1
- Kernel-to-userspace ABI 3.3.2
- In-kernel API 3.3.3
- In-kernel ABI 3.3.4
Technical features 3.4
- Preemption 3.4.1
- Portability 3.4.2
- Kernel panic and oopses 3.4.3
- Security 3.5
- Feature history 3.6
- Estimated cost to redevelop 4.1
Development model 4.2
- Relation with Linux distributions 4.2.1
- Maintenance 4.3
- Revision control 4.4
- Version numbering 4.5
- Timeline 4.6
- Variants 4.7
- See also 5
- References 6
- Further reading 7
- External links 8
In April 1991, Linus Torvalds, a 21-year-old student at the University of Helsinki, Finland started working on some simple ideas for an operating system. He started with a task switcher in Intel 80386 assembly language and a terminal driver. On 25 August 1991, Torvalds posted the following to comp.os.minix, a newsgroup on Usenet:
I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing since April, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat (same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons) among other things). I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few months [...] Yes - it's free of any minix code, and it has a multi-threaded fs. It is NOT portable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-(. [...] It's mostly in C, but most people wouldn't call what I write C. It uses every conceivable feature of the 386 I could find, as it was also a project to teach me about the 386. As already mentioned, it uses a MMU, for both paging (not to disk yet) and segmentation. It's the segmentation that makes it REALLY 386 dependent (every task has a 64Mb segment for code & data - max 64 tasks in 4Gb. Anybody who needs more than 64Mb/task - tough cookies). [...] Some of my "C"-files (specifically mm.c) are almost as much assembler as C. [...] Unlike minix, I also happen to LIKE interrupts, so interrupts are handled without trying to hide the reason behind them.
After that, many people contributed code to the project. Early on, the MINIX community contributed code and ideas to the Linux kernel. At the time, the GNU Project had created many of the components required for a free operating system, but its own kernel, GNU Hurd, was incomplete and unavailable. The BSD operating system had not yet freed itself from legal encumbrances. Despite the limited functionality of the early versions, Linux rapidly accumulated developers and users.
By September 1991, Linux version 0.01 was released on the FTP server (ftp.funet.fi) of the Finnish University and Research Network (FUNET). It had 10,239 lines of code. In October 1991, Linux version 0.02 was released.
In December 1991, Linux 0.11 was released. This version was the first to be self-hosted - Linux 0.11 could be compiled by a computer running Linux 0.11. When he released version 0.12 in February 1992, Torvalds adopted the GNU General Public License (GPL) over his previous self-drafted license, which had not permitted commercial redistribution.
A newsgroup known as alt.os.linux was started, and on 19 January 1992, the first post to alt.os.linux was made. On 31 March 1992, alt.os.linux became comp.os.linux.
The X Window System was soon ported to Linux. In March 1992, Linux version 0.95 was the first to be capable of running X. This large version number jump (from 0.1x to 0.9x) was due to a feeling that a version 1.0 with no major missing pieces was imminent. However, this proved to be somewhat overoptimistic, and from 1993 to early 1994, 15 development versions of version 0.99 appeared.
On 14 March 1994, Linux 1.0.0 was released, with 176,250 lines of code. In March 1995, Linux 1.2.0 was released (310,950 lines of code).
Version 2 of Linux, released on 9 June 1996, was followed by additional major versions under the version 2 header:
- 25 January 1999 - Linux 2.2.0 was released (1,800,847 lines of code).
- 18 December 1999 - IBM mainframe patches for 2.2.13 were published, allowing Linux to be used on enterprise-class machines.
- 4 January 2001 - Linux 2.4.0 was released (3,377,902 lines of code).
- 17 December 2003 - Linux 2.6.0 was released (5,929,913 lines of code).
Starting in 2004, the release process changed and new kernels started coming out on a regular schedule every 2–3 months, numbered 2.6.0, 2.6.1, up through 2.6.39.
On 21 July 2011 Linus Torvalds announced the release of Linux 3.0: "Gone are the 2.6.
As of 2013, the Linux 3.10 release had 15,803,499 lines of code.
The fact that Linux is a monolithic kernel rather than a microkernel was the topic of a debate between Andrew S. Tanenbaum, the creator of MINIX, and Linus Torvalds. The debate, started in 1992 on the Usenet discussion group comp.os.minix, was about Linux and kernel architecture in general. Tanenbaum argued that microkernels are superior to monolithic kernels and that therefore Linux is obsolete. Unlike traditional monolithic kernels, device drivers in Linux are easily configured as loadable kernel modules and are loaded or unloaded while running the system. This subject was revisited on 9 May 2006, and on 12 May 2006 Tanenbaum wrote a position statement.
The huge rise in popularity of Android operating system—which includes the Linux kernel—has alone made the kernel most popular in mobile devices, rivaling the installed base of all other operating systems. In addition, most consumer routers use the Linux kernel, together with kernel's use in a wide variety of devices, such as in servers and smart TVs, and other non-Android embedded systems. However, kernel's use in traditional (non-server) desktop Linux varieties is still low when compared to some other operating systems.
In 2013, Android-based devices outsold Windows-based devices 2.8 to one (two to one in mature markets), or by 573 million units; the gap is estimated to widen even further in 2014 and 2015. Including previous years, three billion Android smartphones are estimated to be sold by the end of 2014.
Initially, Torvalds released Linux under a license which forbade any commercial use. This was changed in version 0.12 to the GNU General Public License (GPL). This license allows distribution and sale of possibly modified and unmodified versions of Linux but requires that all those copies be released under the same license and be accompanied by the complete corresponding source code.
Torvalds has described licensing Linux under the GPL as the "best thing I ever did."
GPL version 3
Currently, Linux is licensed only under version 2 of the GPL, without offering the licensee the option to choose "any later version", and there is some debate over how easily it could be changed to use later GPL versions such as version 3 (and whether this is even desirable). Torvalds himself specifically indicated upon the release of version 2.4.0 that his own code is only under version 2. However, the terms of the GPL state that if no version is specified, then any version may be used, and Alan Cox pointed out that very few other Linux contributors have specified a particular version of the GPL. In September 2006, a survey of 29 key kernel programmers indicated 28 preferred GPLv2 to the then-current GPLv3 draft. Torvalds commented, "I think a number of outsiders... believed that I personally was just the odd man out, because I've been so publicly not a huge fan of the GPLv3."
Loadable kernel modules
Torvalds has stated his belief that LKMs using only a limited, "public" subset of the kernel interfaces can sometimes be non-derived works, thus allowing some binary-only drivers and other LKMs that are not licensed under the GPL. A very good example for this is the usage of dma_buf by the proprietary NVidia graphics drivers. dma_buf is a recent kernel feature (like the rest of the kernel, it is licensed under the GPL) that allows multiple GPUs to quickly copy data into each other's framebuffers. One possible use case would be Nvidia Optimus that pairs a fast GPU with an Intel integrated GPU, where the NVIDIA GPU writes into the Intel framebuffer when it is active. But, NVIDIA cannot use this infrastructure because it uses a technical means to enforce the rule that it can only be used by LKMs that are also GPL. Alan Cox replied on LKML, rejecting a request from one of their engineers to remove this technical enforcement from the API. Not all Linux kernel contributors agree with this interpretation, however, and even Torvalds agrees that many LKMs are clearly derived works, and indeed he writes that "kernel modules ARE derivative 'by default'".
On the other hand Torvalds has also said that "one gray area in particular is something like a driver that was originally written for another operating system (i.e. clearly not a derived work of Linux in origin). [...] THAT is a gray area, and _that_ is the area where I personally believe that some modules may be considered to not be derived works simply because they weren't designed for Linux and don't depend on any special Linux behaviour." Proprietary graphics drivers, in particular, are heavily discussed. Ultimately, it is likely that such questions can only be resolved by a court.
- Network scheduler
- Netfilter and nftables (alternatives for other kernels are e.g. PF developed by OpenBSD, NPF developed by NetBSD)
- Comparison of open-source wireless drivers
Firmware binary blobs
One point of licensing controversy is Linux's use of firmware "binary blobs" to support several hardware devices. These files are under a variety of licenses, many of them restrictive and their exact underlying source code is usually unknown. In the year 2002 Richard Stallman stated why, in his point of view, such blobs make Linux partially non-free software, and that distributing Linux "violates the GPL" (which requires "complete corresponding source code" to be available). In 2008 Free Software Foundation Latin America started a project, Linux-libre, to create a completely free kernel without proprietary objects, which is used by some completely free distributions, such as those endorsed by the Free Software Foundation. On 15 December 2010 the Debian Project announced that the next Debian stable version would come with a kernel "stripped of all non-free firmware bits". This policy was continued with the sequel release of Debian 7 "Wheezy".
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and some other countries. This is the result of an incident in which William Della Croce, Jr., who was not involved in the Linux project, trademarked the name and subsequently demanded royalties for its use. Several Linux backers retained legal counsel and filed suit against Della Croce. The issue was settled in August 1997 when the trademark was assigned to Linus Torvalds.
In March 2003, the SCO Group (SCO) filed a lawsuit against IBM claiming that IBM had violated copyrights that SCO claimed to hold over the Unix source code, by contributing portions of that code to Linux. Additionally, SCO sent letters to a number of companies warning that their use of Linux without a license from SCO may be a violation of copyright law, and claimed in the press that they would be suing individual Linux users. IBM then promised to defend its Linux customers on their behalf. This controversy has generated lawsuits by SCO against Novell, DaimlerChrysler (partially dismissed in July 2004), and AutoZone, and retaliatory lawsuits by Red Hat and others against SCO.
In early 2007, SCO filed the specific details of the purported copyright infringement. Despite previous claims that SCO was the rightful owner of 1 million lines of code, they specified 326 lines of code, most of which were uncopyrightable. In August 2007, the court in the Novell case ruled that SCO did not actually own the Unix copyrights to begin with, though the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in August 2009 that the question of who owned the copyright properly remained for a jury to answer. The jury case was decided on 30 March 2010 in Novell's favour.
Linux kernel is a monolithic kernel. Device drivers and kernel extensions run in kernel space (ring 0 in many CPU architectures), with full access to the hardware, although some exceptions run in user space, for example filesystems based on FUSE. The graphics system most people use with Linux does not run within the kernel, in contrast to that found in Microsoft Windows. Unlike standard monolithic kernels, device drivers are easily configured as modules, and loaded or unloaded while running the system. Also unlike standard monolithic kernels, device drivers can be pre-empted under certain conditions. This latter feature was added to handle hardware interrupts correctly, and to improve support for symmetric multiprocessing. By choice, the Linux kernel has no Binary Kernel Interface.
The hardware is also incorporated into the file hierarchy. Device drivers interface to user applications via an entry in the /dev and/or /sys directories. Process information as well is mapped to the file system through the /proc directory.
Linux kernel supports true preemptive multitasking (both in user mode and kernel mode), virtual memory, shared libraries, demand loading, shared copy-on-write executables (via KSM), memory management, the Internet protocol suite, and threading.
|User mode||User applications||For example, bash, LibreOffice, Apache OpenOffice, Blender, 0 A.D., Mozilla Firefox, etc.|
|Low-level system components:||
systemd, runit, logind, networkd, soundd...
X11, Wayland, Mir, SurfaceFlinger (Android)
GTK+, Qt, EFL, SDL, SFML, FLTK, GNUstep, etc.
Mesa 3D, AMD Catalyst, ...
|C standard library||
open(), exec(), sbrk(), socket(), fopen(), calloc(), ... (up to 2000 subroutines)
glibc aims to be POSIX/SUS-compatible, uClibc targets embedded systems, bionic written for Android, etc.
|Kernel mode||Linux kernel||
stat, splice, dup, read, open, ioctl, write, mmap, close, exit, etc. (about 380 system calls)
The Linux kernel System Call Interface (SCI, aims to be POSIX/SUS-compatible)
Other components: ALSA, DRI, evdev, LVM, device mapper, Linux Network Scheduler, Netfilter
Linux Security Modules: SELinux, TOMOYO, AppArmor, Smack
|Hardware (CPU, main memory, data storage devices, etc.)|
The Linux kernel is written in the version of the C programming language supported by GCC (which has introduced a number of extensions and changes to standard C), together with a number of short sections of code written in the assembly language (in GCC's "AT&T-style" syntax) of the target architecture. Because of the extensions to C it supports, GCC was for a long time the only compiler capable of correctly building the Linux kernel.
GCC is the default compiler for the Linux kernel source. In 2004, Intel claimed to have modified the kernel so that its C compiler also was capable of compiling it. There was another such reported success in 2009 with a modified 2.6.22 version of the kernel.
Since 2010, effort has been underway to build the Linux kernel with Clang, an alternative compiler for the C language; as of 12 April 2014, the official kernel could almost be compiled by Clang. The project dedicated to this effort is named LLVMLinux after the LLVM compiler infrastructure upon which Clang is built. LLVMLinux does not aim to fork either the Linux kernel or the LLVM, therefore it is a meta-project composed of patches that are eventually submitted to the upstream projects. By enabling the Linux kernel to be compiled by Clang, which, among other advantages, is known for its fast compilation times against GCC, the kernel developers may benefit from a faster workflow due to shorter compilation times.
Conformance to standards is a general policy for the Linux kernel's internals.
Source code portability ensures that a C program written by conforming to a standard can be successfully compiled and run on any system that also conforms to the same standard. The relevant standards, aiming to achieve source code portability of programs, that the development of the Linux kernel, the GNU C Library, and associated utilities tries to adhere to, are POSIX and the Single UNIX Specification. However, as of February 2014, no Linux distributions are branded as "UNIX" by The Open Group, mainly because of the costs of the conformance testing.
Binary portability shall guarantee that any program once compiled for a given hardware platform, can be run in its compiled form on any other hardware platform that conforms to the standard. Binary portability is an essential requirement for the commercial viability of independent software vendor (ISV) applications built for the operating systems based on the Linux kernel. Binary compatibility is much more demanding than source code portability; as of February 2014, the only standard concerning itself with binary compatibility is the Linux Standard Base (LSB).
There are a couple of kernel internal APIs utilized between the different subsystems and subsystems of subsystems. Some of them have been kept stable over several releases, other have not. There are no guarantees regarding the in-kernel APIs. Maintainers and contributors are free to augment or change them at any time.
Examples of in-kernel APIs include software frameworks/APIs for the following classes of device drivers:
- Video4Linux – for video capture hardware
- Advanced Linux Sound Architecture – for sound cards
- New API – for network interface controllers
- Direct Rendering Manager – for graphics accelerators
- KMS driver – for display controllers
- mac80211 – for wireless network interface controllers
- WEXT – for wireless network interface controllers (obsolete).
Strong interests in defining and maintaining a stable in-kernel ABI over several releases have been voiced repeatedly over time by parties, e.g. hardware manufactures, writing proprietary kernel modules and distributing binary-only software, e.g. device drivers.
By explicit choice the Linux kernel does not maintain a stable in-kernel ABI. The reasons are purely technical and not philosophical. Due to the absence of an in-kernel ABI that has to be kept stable over releases, the Linux kernel can keep a much higher rate of development.
The Linux kernel provides preemptive scheduling under certain conditions. Until kernel version 2.4, only user processes were preemptive, i.e., in addition to time quantum expiration, an execution of current process in user mode would be interrupted if higher dynamic priority processes entered
TASK_RUNNING state. Toward 2.6.x series of the Linux kernel, an ability to interrupt a task executing kernel code was added, although with that not all sections of the kernel code can be preempted.
The Linux kernel contains different scheduler classes. By default the kernel uses a scheduler mechanism called the Completely Fair Scheduler introduced in the 2.6.23 version of the kernel. Internally this default-scheduler class is also known as
SCHED_OTHER, but the kernel also contains two real-time scheduling classes named
SCHED_FIFO (realtime first-in-first-out) and
SCHED_RR (realtime round-robin) both of which take precedence over the default class.
Through the use of the real-time Linux patch
PREEMPT_RT, support for full preemption of critical sections, interrupt handlers, and "interrupt disable" code sequences can be supported. Partial mainline integration of real-time Linux already brings some functionality to Linux mainline. Preemption improves latency, increases responsiveness, and makes Linux more suitable for desktop and real-time applications. Older versions of the kernel had a so-called big kernel lock for synchronization across the entire kernel. This was finally removed by Arnd Bergmann in 2011.
Additional scheduling policy known as
SCHED_DEADLINE, implementing the earliest deadline first algorithm (EDF), was added to the Linux scheduler in version 3.14 of the Linux kernel mainline, released on 30 March 2014.
While not originally designed to be portable, Linux is now one of the most widely ported operating system kernels, running on a diverse range of systems from the ARM architecture to IBM Z/Architecture mainframe computers. The first port beyond Linux's original 386 architecture was to the Motorola 68000 platform by Amiga users, but to do this port they replaced major parts of the kernel, leading Torvalds to call it a fork and a "Linux-like operating system". With this experience in mind, Torvalds led a major restructure of the kernel code to facilitate the next port effort, to the DEC Alpha AXP platform, and support both 386 and Alpha in a single source tree.
Linux runs as the main operating system on IBM's Blue Gene and other fastest supercomputers. As of November 2014, the Linux OS family has a 97% share of all systems on the TOP500 supercomputers list. Linux has also been ported to various handheld devices such as TuxPhone, Apple's iPod and iPhone. Some operating systems developed for mobile phones use modified versions of the Linux kernel, including Google Android, Firefox OS, HP webOS, and Nokia Maemo.
Kernel panic and oopses
In Linux, a "panic" is an unrecoverable system error detected by the kernel, as opposed to similar errors detected by user space code. It is possible for kernel code to indicate such a condition by calling the
panic function located in the header file sys/system.h. However, most panics are the result of unhandled processor exceptions in kernel code, such as references to invalid memory addresses. These are typically indicative of a bug somewhere in the call chain leading to the panic. They can also indicate a failure of hardware, such as a failed RAM cell or errors in arithmetic functions in the processor caused by a processor bug, overheating/damaged processor, or a soft error.
A report of a non-fatal bug in the kernel is called an "
- Linux Kernel documentation index
- Linux Kernel man pages
- Kernel bugzilla - Regressions for each of recent versions
- The Linux Kernel Mailing List Archive
- Kernel Newbies Site - Excellent source of information for people new to kernel
- LinGrok, Linux kernel source code cross-reference
- Greg Kroah Hartman on the Linux kernel on YouTube
- Torvalds, Linus; Diamond, David (2001).
- Bezroukov, Nikolai. "Ch 4: A benevolent dictator". Portraits of Open Source Pioneers (e-book). Softpanorama.
- "LinkSys and binary modules". LWN.net Weekly Edition. 16 October 2003.
- FreeBSD/Linux kernel source code cross-reference (Browsable Linux (and other operating system) kernel source cross-reference).
- LXR: The Linux Cross-Reference project (Browsable Linux kernel source).
- KernelHQ (A browsable kernel source tree - with all versions present, and with browsable
- "The LWN 2001 Linux Timeline".
- "Everyone's Favorite Linux Mascot".
- "Linux Timeline".
- "History of Linux".
- "Upgrade to 2.6 kernel".
- Pranevich, Joseph (December 2003). "The Wonderful World of Linux 2.6".
- Aas, Josh (17 February 2005). "Understanding the Linux 18.104.22.168 CPU Scheduler". Archived from the original on 2007-09-29.
- "Seminar Paper on Linux Kernel 2.6".
- Linux Device Drivers (3rd ed.).
- Understanding the Linux Kernel (Book) (3rd ed.).
- "Linux: The GPL And Binary Modules".
- "Anatomy of the Linux kernel".
- Linux Online (2008). "Linux Logos and Mascots". Archived from the original on 15 August 2010. Retrieved 11 August 2009.
- "The linux-kernel mailing list FAQ". Tux.Org.
- InfoWorld. "Linux creator Torvalds still no fan of GPLv3". Retrieved 2008-10-11.
- "Linux Kernel Copying". Retrieved 2013-09-25.
- Stallman, Richard (2002). "Linux, GNU, and freedom".
- "linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/blob - firmware/WHENCE". git.kernel.org. 2002-10-16. Retrieved 2012-08-21.
- "README". git.kernel.org. Retrieved 2010-11-12.
- Richardson, Marjorie (1 November 1999). "Interview: Linus Torvalds". Linux Journal. Retrieved 20 August 2009.
- "Free as in Freedom by Sam Williams. O'Reilly books, 2002". Oreilly.com. Retrieved 2010-11-12.
- Torvalds, Linus (2006-09-25). "Re: GPLv3 Position Statement".
- Torvalds, Linus Benedict. "What would you like to see most in minix?".
- Torvalds, Linus Benedict. "Free minix-like kernel sources for 386-AT".
- Torvalds, Linus. "Release Notes for Linux v0.12". The Linux Kernel Archives. Retrieved 2007-02-21.
- Summers, David W (19 January 1992). "Troubles with Partitions".
- Clegg, Alan B (31 March 1992). "It's here!".
- "Linux Kernel Data". Archived from the original on 23 May 2011.
- Hachman, Mark (22 July 2011). "Linux 3.0 Released; Linus Torvalds Explains Why You Shouldn't Care".
- Leemhuis, Thorsten (1 July 2013). "What's new in Linux 3.10". The H.
- O'Reilly (1999). "The Tanenbaum-Torvalds Debate". O'Reilly. Retrieved 2006-11-22.
- Tanenbaum, Andy (29 January 1992). "LINUX is obsolete".
- Torvalds, Linus (9 May 2006). "Hybrid kernel, not NT". Retrieved 2007-01-06.
- Tanenbaum, Andy (12 May 2006). "Tanenbaum-Torvalds Debate: Part II". Retrieved 2007-01-06.
Anthony, Sebastian (29 September 2014). "Shellshock: A deadly new vulnerability that could lay waste to the internet (updated)". Retrieved 23 October 2014.
most consumer routers run an embedded version of Linux
- "Gartner Says Sales of Tablets Will Represent Less Than 10 Percent of All Devices in 2014: Smartphones to Represent 71 Percent of the Global Mobile Phone Market in 2014: Android Device Shipments to Reach One Billion in Emerging Markets in 2015" (Press release). Gartner. 15 October 2014. Retrieved 19 October 2014.
- "Tablet Sales Growth Plummets In 2014 As Android Smartphones Continue To Soar: Gartner".
- "Global PC Shipments Exceed Forecast with Mild Improvement in Consumer Demand, While Apple Moves to #5 Spot, According to IDC".
- Yamagata, Hiroo (1997). "The Pragmatist of Free Software". HotWired. Archived from the original on 2007-02-10. Retrieved 2007-02-21.
- Corbet, Jonathan (2006-01-31). "GPLv3 and the kernel".
- Torvalds, Linus (2000-09-08). "Linux-2.4.0-test8". Linux-kernel mailing list archive. Unix Systems Support Group of
- Cox, Alan (2006-01-20). "Re: GPL V3 and Linux". Linux-kernel mailing list archive. LWN.net. Retrieved 2007-02-21.
- Shankland, Stephen (25 September 2006). "Top Linux programmers pan GPL 3".
- Clark, Rob; Semwal, Sumit (2012-11-01). "DMA Buffer Sharing Framework: An Introduction" (PDF). Embedded Linux Conference. Retrieved 2014-08-02.
- "[PATCH] dma-buf: Use EXPORT_SYMBOL". 2012-10-10.
- Torvalds, Linus (2003-12-10). "RE: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?".
, Linus (2003-12-03). "Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?". Ussg.iu.edu. Retrieved 2010-11-12.
- "Linux-libre project". www.fsfla.org. Retrieved 2009-10-05.
- "Trisquel GNU/Linux-libre". trisquel.info. Retrieved 2009-10-05.
- "Debian 6.0 "Squeeze" to be released with completely free Linux Kernel".
- Hughes, Phil (1997-08-01). "Linux Trademark Dispute".
- Hughes, Phil (1 March 1997). "Action Taken on Linux Trademark".
- Gisselberg, Tonya (2010). "The Trademark History of Linux, the Operating System".
- "Report from the Courthouse 7 March". Groklaw article
- "Court Rules: Novell owns the UNIX and UnixWare copyrights". Groklaw article
- Ryan, Justin (August 2009). "SCO Will Try Again". Retrieved 2009-08-30.
- Harvey, Tom (2010-03-30). "Jury says Novell owns Unix copyrights".
- Nguyen, Binh (30 July 2004). "Linux Filesystem Hierarchy: Chapter 1. Linux Filesystem Hierarchy". The Linux Documentation Project. Retrieved 28 November 2012.
- Kubbilun, Ingo A. (2004-06-02). "Linux kernel patch for Intel Compiler". Pyrillion.org. Retrieved 2010-11-12.
- "Slashdot | High Performance Linux Kernel Project — LinuxDNA". Linux.slashdot.org. Retrieved 2010-10-30.
- "LinuxDNA Supercharges Linux with the Intel C/C++ Compiler". Linux Journal. Retrieved 2010-10-30.
- "LLVMLinux". The Linux Foundation. Retrieved 10 June 2014.
- "LLVMLinux". The Linux Foundation. Retrieved 10 June 2014.
- "AMD exploring new Linux driver Strategy". 2014-03-22. Retrieved 2014-03-23.
- "mac80211 documentation". Retrieved 2014-06-08.
- Bovet, Daniel P.; Cesati, Marco (October 2000). "Chapter 10, Understanding the Linux Kernel".
- Santhanam, Anand (23 September 2003). "Towards Linux 2.6, A look into the workings of the next new kernel".
- Bar, Moshe. "The Linux Scheduler".
- Molnár, Ingo (2007-04-13). "[patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]". linux-kernel mailing list. http://lwn.net/Articles/230501/.
- McKenney, Paul. "A realtime preemption overview".
- "OSADL Project: Realtime Linux". www.osadl.org. Retrieved 2012-02-05.
- "BKL: that's all folks"git.kernel.org: .
- "Linux kernel 3.14". kernelnewbies.org. 2014-03-30. Retrieved 2014-04-02.
- "The Linux 3.14 Kernel Already Has Many Exciting Features". Phoronix.
- Torvalds, Linus (1999). "The Linux edge". Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution. O'Reilly.
- "Category: Operating system Family". Top 500 Supercomputer Sites. November 2014.
- "Android Now Running On iPhone 3G". 2010-05-07. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- "Linux developer explains Android kernel code removal".
- "Maemo platform described as being based on Linux kernel". Maemo community. 2010-04-09. Retrieved 2010-04-09.
- "Linux-Kernel Archive: Re: what's an OOPS". Lkml.indiana.edu. Retrieved 2010-10-30.
- "kerneloops(8) - Linux man page". Linux.die.net. Retrieved 2010-10-30.
- "Features/ABRTF12". FedoraProject. 2009-08-03. Retrieved 2010-10-30.
- "Kerneloops.org". Kerneloops.org. Retrieved 2014-03-05.
- Mookhey, K.K.; Burghate, Nilesh & ISACA (2005). Linux-- Security, Audit and Control Features. ISACA. p. 14.
- Hatch, Brian (2008). Hacking exposed Linux: Linux security secrets & solutions. McGraw Hill Professional. p. 524.
- Jaeger, Trent (2008). Operating system security. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. p. 122.
- Andrews, Jeremy (2008-07-16). "Security Bugs and Full Disclosure". Archived from the original on 19 July 2008. Retrieved 2010-12-31.
- Spengler, Brad (2008-07-16). "Linux's unofficial security-through-coverup policy". Full-Disclosure mailing list. http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2008/Jul/276. Retrieved 2010-12-31.
- "The Intel SYSRET privilege escalation –". Blog.xen.org. 2012-06-13. Retrieved 2012-07-26.
- Anderson, Gareth (15 April 2006). "GNU/Linux Command-Line Tools Summary". The Linux Documentation Project. Retrieved 28 November 2012.
- "Kernel 1.0 Source Code Release". Retrieved 2008-10-27.
- "Kernel 1.2 Source Code Release". Retrieved 2008-10-27.
- Source Code Releases"x"Kernel 2.0.. Retrieved 2008-10-27.
- Source Code Releases"x"Kernel 2.2.. Retrieved 2008-10-27.
- "The Wonderful World of Linux 2.2". Retrieved 2008-10-27.
- Source Code Releases"x"Kernel 2.4.. Retrieved 2008-10-27.
- "The Wonderful World of Linux 2.4". Retrieved 2008-10-27.
- Source Code Releases"y.x"Kernel 2.6.. Retrieved 2008-10-27.
- "proc(5) - Linux manual page" (see /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max).
- "Index of /pub/linux/kernel/v2.6". Kernel.org. Retrieved 2014-03-02.
- Bhartiya, Swapnil. "Linux Kills Support For Intel's 386 Processors". Retrieved 13 December 2012.
- Vaughan, Steven J. (2012-12-13). "Good-Bye 386: Linux to drop support for i386 chips with next major release". ZDNet. Retrieved 2013-02-06.
- Vaughan, Steven J. (2012-12-11). "Linux 3.7 arrives, ARM developers rejoice". ZDNet. Retrieved 2013-02-06.
- "Linux 3.11". kernelnewbies.org. 2013-09-02. Retrieved 2014-01-21.
- "Linux Evolution". 2008-03-26.
- "Perpetual Development: A Model of the Linux Kernel Life Cycle". 2011-10-25.
- Wheeler, David A. "Linux Kernel 2.6: It's Worth More!".
- "Economic impact of FLOSS on innovation and competitiveness of the EU ICT sector" (Table 3 on page 50).
- "Estimating Total Development Cost Of a Linux Distribution" (Table on page 6).
- "The Billion Dollar Kernel". Linux.slashdot.org. 2010-02-24. Retrieved 2010-11-12.
- Wheeler, David. "The Linux Kernel: It’s Worth More!". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
- Offline, Jeremy (2001-10-13). "Linux: 2.6.16.y Lives On". KernelTrap. Retrieved 2010-10-30.
- Offline, Jeremy (2001-10-13). "Linux: Maintaining A 2.6.16.y Tree". KernelTrap. Archived from the original on 20 June 2010. Retrieved 2010-10-30.
- Linux 2.6.27 will be a longtime supported kernel' - MARC"'". Marc.info. 2008-10-11. Retrieved 2010-10-30.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (2009-09-08). "Re: 2.6.27 maintenance plans after 2.6.32 is released". linux-kernel mailing list. http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125245118518458.
- 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 "This Just Isn't Working Any More". KernelTrap.
- "Stephen Rothwell: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))". LKML. Retrieved 2010-10-30.
- "linux-next and patch management process". Lwn.net. 2010-10-21. Retrieved 2010-10-30.
- "The Linux Kernel Archives". Kernel.org. Retrieved 2014-01-22.
- See the Linux MAINTAINERS file.
- Weinehall, David (2004-02-08). ""[ANNOUNCE] Linux-kernel 2.0.40 aka ``The Moss-covered Tortoise.
- Petersen, Marc-Christian (2005-01-13). "Linux 2.2.27-rc2".
- Petersen, Marc-Christian (2004-02-25). "Linux 2.2.26".
- Tarreau, Willy (2010-12-18). "Linux 22.214.171.124". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/18/73.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (3 August 2006). "Adrian Bunk is now taking over the 2.6.16-stable branch". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/3/271.
- Bunk, Adrian (2008-10-11). "Linux 2.6.27 will be a longtime supported kernel". Linux kernel mailing list. http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122375909403298.
- Torvalds, Linus (9 October 2008). "Linux 2.6.27". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/9/415.
- Tarreau, Willy (17 March 2012). "Linux 126.96.36.199". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/17/38.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (12 December 2010). "Willy Tarreau is taking over the 2.6.27-longterm kernel release". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/12/140.
- "Linux 2 6 27 - Linux Kernel Newbies". Kernelnewbies. Retrieved 2010-10-30.
- Torvalds, Linus (2 December 2009). "Linux 2.6.32". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/3/11.
- Tarreau, Willy (23 November 2014). "Linux 188.8.131.52". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/23/181.
- "Active kernel releases". Kernel.org. 6 August 2013. Retrieved 3 July 2014.
- Tarreau, Willy (5 March 2012). "Re: Linux 184.108.40.206". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/4/141.
- Walker-Morgan, Dj (5 March 2012). "Maintenance of Linux kernel 2.6.32 is slowing down". The H Open.
- "Package: linux-image-2.6-686 (2.6.32+29)". Debian.org. Retrieved 9 July 2014.
- "Ubuntu Kernel Team Extended Support".
- Torvalds, Linus (24 February 2010). "Linux 2.6.33 released". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/24/301.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (7 November 2011). "Linux 220.127.116.11". Linux kernel mailing list. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1212299.
- Leemhuis, Thorsten (23 March 2011). "Kernel Log: Development of 2.6.39 under way, series 33 revived". The H Open.
- Torvalds, Linus (16 May 2010). "Linux 2.6.34". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/16/89.
- Gortmaker, Paul (11 February 2014). "Linux 18.104.22.168". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/11/368.
- Gortmaker, Paul (3 December 2010). "Announcement: Plans for v2.6.34-longterm". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1012.0/01338.html.
- Torvalds, Linus (1 August 2010). "Linux 2.6.35". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/1/188.
- Kleen, Andi (1 August 2011). "[ANNOUNCE The longterm Linux 22.214.171.124 kernel is released"]. Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/1/324.
- Kleen, Andi (3 December 2010). "Plans for 2.6.35-longterm was Re: Linux stable kernel release procedure changes". Linux Kernel Mailing List. Retrieved 17 May 2013.
- Torvalds, Linus (18 May 2011). "Linux 2.6.39". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/19/16.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (3 August 2011). "Linux 126.96.36.199". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1108.0/01203.html.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (22 October 2013). "Linux 3.0.101". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/22/125.
- Leemhuis, Thorsten (12 January 2012). "Kernel Log: 15,000,000 lines, 3.0 promoted to long-term kernel". The H Open.
- Torvalds, Linus (24 October 2011). "Linux 3.1". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1110.3/00210.html.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (18 January 2012). "Linux 3.1.10". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1201.2/01340.html.
- Torvalds, Linus (4 January 2012). "Linux 3.2". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1201.0/01228.html.
- Hutchings, Ben (5 November 2014). "Linux 3.2.64". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/5/815.
- von Eitzen, Chris (23 April 2012). "Long-term maintenance for Linux 3.2". The H Open.
- Torvalds, Linus (18 March 2012). "Linux 3.3 release". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1203.2/00881.html.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (4 June 2012). "Linux 3.3.8". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1206.0/01162.html.
- Torvalds, Linus (20 May 2012). "Linux 3.4 released". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1205.2/02545.html.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (25 September 2014). "Linux 3.4.104". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/25/730.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (26 August 2014). "Li Zefan is now the 3.4 stable maintainer". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/26/758.
- Torvalds, Linus (21 July 2012). "Linux 3.5 released". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1207.2/02998.html.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (12 October 2013). "Linux 3.5.7". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1210.1/03204.html.
- Krzesinski, Herton Ronaldo (9 November 2012). "Linux 3.6.11". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/9/184.
- Torvalds, Linus (30 September 2012). "Linux 3.6". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1209.3/04237.html.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (17 December 2012). "Linux 3.6.11". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/17/353.
- Torvalds, Linus (10 December 2012). "Linux 3.7". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1212.1/01005.html.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (27 February 2013). "Linux 3.7.10". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1302.3/01806.html.
- Stahie, Silviu (1 March 2013). "Linux Kernel 3.7.10 Officially Reaches End of Life, Kernel.org Website Updated".
- Torvalds, Linus (18 February 2013). "Linux 3.8". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1302.2/00936.html.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (11 May 2013). "Linux 3.8.13". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1305.1/02171.html.
- Walker-Morgan, DJ (15 May 2013). "Canonical to maintain Linux 3.8 until August 2014". The H Open.
- Torvalds, Linus (28 April 2013). "Linux 3.9 released". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1304.3/02009.html.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (21 July 2013). "Linux 3.9.11". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/21/178.
- Torvalds, Linus (30 June 2013). "Linux 3.10". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1306.3/04336.html.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (7 December 2014). "Linux 3.10.62". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/7/127.
- "Longterm kernel 3.10 - Linux Kernel Monkey Log".
- Torvalds, Linus (2 September 2013). "Linux 3.11". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1309.0/00650.html.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (29 November 2013). "Linux 3.11.10". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/29/327.
- Torvalds, Linus (3 November 2013). "Linux 3.12 released .. and no merge window yet .. and 4.0 plans?". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1311.0/00914.html.
- Slabý, Jiří (5 December 2014). "Linux 3.12.34". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/5/397.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (26 February 2014). "3.12-stable kernel tree being taken over by Jiří Slabý". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/26/596.
- Torvalds, Linus (19 January 2014). "Linux 3.13". Linux kernel mailing list. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1401.2/01593.html.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (23 April 2014). "Linux 3.13.11". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/22/899.
- "[ANNOUNCE Linux 3.13.y.z extended stable support"]. Linux kernel mailing list. 24 April 2014. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/23/516.
- Torvalds, Linus (30 March 2014). "Linux 3.14". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/30/336.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (7 December 2014). "Linux 3.14.26". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/7/129.
- Torvalds, Linus (9 July 2014). "Linux 3.15". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/8/70.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (14 August 2014). "Linux 3.15.10". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/14/7.
- Torvalds, Linus (3 August 2014). "Linux 3.16". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/3/82.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (30 October 2014). "Linux 3.16.7". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/30/583.
- Henriques, Luis (30 October 2014). "Linux 3.16.y.z extended stable support". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/30/649.
- Torvalds, Linus (5 October 2014). "Linux 3.17". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/5/126.
- Kroah-Hartman, Greg (7 December 2014). "Linux 3.17.6". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/7/136.
- Torvalds, Linus (7 December 2014). "Linux 3.18". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/7/202.
- Torvalds, Linus (7 December 2014). "Linux 3.18". Linux kernel mailing list. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/7/202.
- Linux Kernel Mailing List (2005-06-17). "Linux 2.6.12".
- Williams, Riley. "Linux Kernel Archives - Volume 1".
- Offline, Jeremy (2001-10-13). "Kernel Release Numbering Redux". KernelTrap. Retrieved 2010-10-30.
- "Linus Torvalds: RFD: Kernel release numbering". LKML. Retrieved 2010-10-30.
- Torvalds, Linus (2011-05-29). "Linux 3.0-rc1". Retrieved 2011-08-16.
- "Linus Torvalds: Linux 3.12 released .. and no merge window yet .. and 4.0 plans?". LKML. Retrieved 2014-01-22.
- Comparison of operating system kernels
- menuconfig – an ncurses-based target for the Linux kernel makefile
Variants of the Linux kernel include the following:
In addition to Linus's "-rc" development releases, sometimes the version will have a suffix such as "tip", indicating another development branch, usually (but not always) the initials of a person who made it. For example, "ck" stands for Con Kolivas, "ac" stands for Alan Cox, etc. Sometimes, the letters are related to the primary development area of the branch the kernel is built from, for example, "wl" indicates a wireless networking test build. Also, distributors may have their own suffixes with different numbering systems and for back-ports to their "enterprise" (i.e. stable but older) distribution versions.
On 29 May 2011, Linus Torvalds announced that the kernel version would be bumped to 3.0 for the release following 2.6.39, due to the minor version number getting too large and to commemorate the 20th anniversary of Linux. It continued the time-based release practice introduced with 2.6.0, but using the second number—e.g. 3.1 would follow 3.0 after a few months. An additional number (now the third number) would be added on when necessary to designate security and bug fixes, as for example with 3.0.18. The major version number might be raised to 4 at some future date.
The first use of the fourth number occurred when a grave error, which required immediate fixing, was encountered in 2.6.8's NFS code. However, there were not enough other changes to legitimize the release of a new minor revision (which would have been 2.6.9). So, 188.8.131.52 was released, with the only change being the fix of that error. With 2.6.11, this was adopted as the new official versioning policy. Later it became customary to continuously back-port major bug-fixes and security patches to released kernels and indicate that by updating the fourth number.
In 2004, after version 2.6.0 was released, the kernel developers held several discussions regarding the release and version scheme and ultimately Linus Torvalds and others decided that a much shorter "time-based" release cycle would be beneficial. For about seven years, the first two numbers remained "2.6", and the third number was incremented with each new release, which rolled out after two to three months. A fourth number was sometimes added to account for bug and security fixes (only) to the kernel version. The even-odd system of alternation between stable and unstable was gone. Instead, development pre-releases are titled release candidates, which is indicated by appending the suffix '-rc' to the kernel version, followed by an ordinal number.
After the 1.0 release and prior to version 2.6, the number was composed as "A.B.C", where the number A denoted the kernel version, the number B denoted the major revision of the kernel, and the number C indicated the minor revision of the kernel. The kernel version was changed only when major changes in the code and the concept of the kernel occurred, twice in the history of the kernel: in 1994 (version 1.0) and in 1996 (version 2.0). Version 3.0 was released in 2011, but it was not a major change in kernel concept. The major revision was assigned according to the traditional even-odd system version numbering system. The minor revision had been changed whenever security patches, bug fixes, new features or drivers were implemented in the kernel.
The first scheme was used in the run-up to "1.0". The first version of the kernel was 0.01. This was followed by 0.02, 0.03, 0.10, 0.11, 0.12 (the first GPL version), 0.95, 0.96, 0.97, 0.98, 0.99 and then 1.0. From 0.95 on there were many patch releases between versions.
The Linux kernel has had three different numbering schemes.
In April 2005, however, efforts to reverse-engineer the BitKeeper system by Andrew Tridgell led BitMover, the company which maintained BitKeeper, to stop supporting the Linux development community. In response, Linus Torvalds and others wrote a new source code control system for the purpose, called Git. The new system was written within weeks, and in two months the first official kernel release was made using Git. Git soon developed into a separate project in its own right and gained wide adoption in the free software community.
In 2002, Linux kernel development switched to BitKeeper, an SCM system which satisfied Linus Torvalds' technical requirements. BitKeeper was made available to Linus and several others free of charge, but was not free software, which was a source of controversy. The system did provide some interoperability with free SCM systems such as CVS and Subversion.
The Linux kernel source code used to be maintained without the help of an automated source code management system, mostly because of Linus Torvalds' dislike of centralized SCM systems.
|Kernel series||Original release date||Current version||Maintainer||Support Model|
|Old version, no longer supported: 0.01||17 September 1991||0.03||EOL|
|Old version, no longer supported: 0.10||November 1991||0.12||EOL|
|Old version, no longer supported: 0.95||8 March 1992||0.99.15||EOL|
|Old version, no longer supported: 1.0||14 March 1994||1.0.9||EOL|
|Old version, no longer supported: 1.1||6 April 1994||1.1.95||EOL|
|Old version, no longer supported: 1.2||7 March 1995||1.2.13||EOL|
|Old version, no longer supported: 1.3||12 June 1995||1.3.100||EOL|
|Old version, no longer supported: pre2.0||12 May 1996||pre2.0.14||EOL|
|Old version, no longer supported: 2.0||9 June 1996||2.0.40||David Weinehall||EOL (Officially made obsolete with the kernel 2.2.0 release)|
|Old version, no longer supported: 2.2||26 January 1999||2.2.26||Marc-Christian Petersen (formerly Alan Cox)||EOL (Unofficially obsolete with the 2.2.27-rc2)|
|Old version, no longer supported: 2.4||4 January 2001||184.108.40.206||Willy Tarreau (formerly Marcelo Tosatti)||EOL (Maintained from December 2008 to December 2011), last stable release of the 2.4 kernel series.|
|Old version, no longer supported: 2.6||18 December 2003||2.6.15||EOL|
|Old version, no longer supported: 2.6.16||20 March 2006||220.127.116.11||Adrian Bunk (formerly Greg Kroah-Hartman)||EOL (First long-term stable release from March 2006 to July 2008)|
|Old version, no longer supported: 2.6.27||9 October 2008||18.104.22.168||Willy Tarreau (formerly Greg Kroah-Hartman)||EOL (Second long-term stable release from October 2008 to March 2012)|
|Older version, yet still supported: 2.6.32||2 December 2009||22.214.171.124||Willy Tarreau (formerly Greg Kroah-Hartman)||Third long-term stable release from December 2009 to mid-2015, used in Debian 6 Squeeze. Canonical will also provide support until April 2015.|
|Old version, no longer supported: 2.6.33||24 February 2010||126.96.36.199||Greg Kroah-Hartman||EOL (Fourth long-term stable release from March 2011 to November 2011). Base for Real-Time-Tree, replaced by 3.0.x|
|Old version, no longer supported: 2.6.34||16 May 2010||188.8.131.52||Paul Gortmaker||EOL (Fifth long-term stable release from January 2011 to February 2014)|
|Old version, no longer supported: 2.6.35||1 August 2010||184.108.40.206||Andi Kleen||EOL (Sixth long-term stable release from December 2010 to March 2012)|
|Old version, no longer supported: 2.6.39||18 May 2011||220.127.116.11||Greg Kroah-Hartman||EOL (Maintained from May 2011 to August 2011), last stable release of the 2.6 kernel series.|
|Old version, no longer supported: 3.0||21 July 2011||3.0.101||Greg Kroah-Hartman||EOL (Seventh long-term stable release from July 2011 to October 2013 (Base for Real-Time-Tree))|
|Old version, no longer supported: 3.1||24 October 2011||3.1.10||Greg Kroah-Hartman||EOL (Maintained from October 2011 to January 2012)|
|Older version, yet still supported: 3.2||4 January 2012||3.2.64||Ben Hutchings||Eighth long-term stable release from March 2012 to 2016, used in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, Debian 7 Wheezy and Slackware 14.0. Canonical will provide extended support until April 2017.|
|Old version, no longer supported: 3.3||18 March 2012||3.3.8||Greg Kroah-Hartman||EOL (Maintained from March 2012 to June 2012)|
|Older version, yet still supported: 3.4||20 May 2012||3.4.104||Li Zefan (formerly Greg Kroah-Hartman)||Ninth long-term stable release from May 2012 to September 2016|
|Old version, no longer supported: 3.5||21 July 2012||3.5.7||Greg Kroah-Hartman||EOL (Maintained by Kroah-Hartman until the release of 3.6.1, from July 2012 to October 2012). Canonical provides extended support until April 2014.|
|Old version, no longer supported: 3.6||30 September 2012||3.6.11||Greg Kroah-Hartman||EOL (Maintained from October 2012 to December 2012)|
|Old version, no longer supported: 3.7||10 December 2012||3.7.10||Greg Kroah-Hartman||EOL (Maintained from December 2012 to March 2013)|
|Old version, no longer supported: 3.8||18 February 2013||3.8.13||Greg Kroah-Hartman||EOL (Maintained from February 2013 to May 2013). Canonical provides extended support until August 2014.|
|Old version, no longer supported: 3.9||28 April 2013||3.9.11||Greg Kroah-Hartman||EOL (Maintained from April 2013 to July 2013)|
|Older version, yet still supported: 3.10||30 June 2013||3.10.62||Greg Kroah-Hartman||Tenth long-term stable release from August 2013 to September 2015.|
|Old version, no longer supported: 3.11||2 September 2013||3.11.10||Greg Kroah-Hartman||EOL (Maintained from September 2013 to November 2013). Canonical provides extended support until August 2014.|
|Older version, yet still supported: 3.12||3 November 2013||3.12.34||Jiří Slabý (formerly Greg Kroah-Hartman)||Eleventh long-term stable release from November 2013 to 2016|
|Old version, no longer supported: 3.13||19 January 2014||3.13.11||Greg Kroah-Hartman||EOL (Maintained from January 2014 to April 2014). Canonical provides extended support until April 2016.|
|Older version, yet still supported: 3.14||30 March 2014||3.14.26||Greg Kroah-Hartman||Twelfth long-term stable release from March 2014 to August 2016|
|Old version, no longer supported: 3.15||8 June 2014||3.15.10||Greg Kroah-Hartman||EOL (Maintained from June 2014 to August 2014)|
|Old version, no longer supported: 3.16||3 August 2014||3.16.7||Greg Kroah-Hartman||EOL (Maintained from August 2014 to October 2014) Canonical provides extended support until April 2016.|
|Older version, yet still supported: 3.17||5 October 2014||3.17.6||Greg Kroah-Hartman||Latest stable version|
|Current stable version: 3.18||7 December 2014||3.18||Linus Torvalds||Latest mainline version|
Most Linux users run a kernel supplied by their Linux distribution. Some distributions ship the "vanilla" and/or "stable" kernels. However, several Linux distribution vendors (such as Red Hat and Debian) maintain another set of Linux kernel branches which are integrated into their products. These are by and large updated at a slower pace compared to the "vanilla" branch, and they usually include all fixes from the relevant "stable" branch, but at the same time they can also add support for drivers or features which had not been released in the "vanilla" version the distribution vendor started basing their branch from.
Relation with Linux distributions
As of January 2014 the currently in-development version of the Linux kernel is held in an unstable branch named linux-next.
After the change of the development model with 2.6.x, developers continued to want what one might call an unstable kernel tree, one that changes as rapidly as new patches come in. Andrew Morton decided to repurpose his -mm tree from memory management to serve as the destination for all new and experimental code. In September 2007 Morton decided to stop maintaining this tree. In February 2008, Stephen Rothwell created the linux-next tree to serve as a place where patches aimed to be merged during the next development cycle are gathered. Several subsystem maintainers also adopted the suffix -next for trees containing code which is meant to be submitted for inclusion in the next release cycle.
As a response to the lack of a stable kernel tree where people could coordinate the collection of bug fixes as such, in December 2005 Adrian Bunk announced that he would keep releasing 2.6.16.y kernels when the stable team moved on to 2.6.17. He also included some driver updates, making the maintenance of the 2.6.16 series very similar to the old rules for maintenance of a stable series such as 2.4. Since then, the "stable team" had been formed, and it would keep updating kernel versions with bug fixes. In October 2008 Adrian Bunk announced that he will maintain 2.6.27 for a few years as a replacement of 2.6.16. The stable team picked up on the idea and as of 2010 they continue to maintain that version and release bug fixes for it, in addition to others.
The development model for Linux 2.6 was a significant change from the development model for Linux 2.5. Previously there was a stable branch (2.4) where only relatively minor and safe changes were merged, and an unstable branch (2.5), where bigger changes and cleanups were allowed. Both of these branches had been maintained by the same set of people, led by Torvalds. This meant that users would always have a well-tested 2.4 version with the latest security and bug fixes to use, though they would have to wait for the features which went into the 2.5 branch. The downside of this was that the "stable" kernel ended up so far behind that it no longer supported recent hardware and lacked needed features. In the late 2.5.x series kernel some maintainers elected to try and back port their changes to the stable series kernel which resulted in bugs being introduced into the 2.4.x series kernel. The 2.5 branch was then eventually declared stable and renamed to 2.6. But instead of opening an unstable 2.7 branch, the kernel developers decided to continue putting major changes into the 2.6 branch, which would then be released at a pace faster than 2.4.x but slower than 2.5.x. This had the desirable effect of making new features more quickly available and getting more testing of the new code, which was added in smaller batches and easier to test.
In the current scheme, the main branch of development is not a traditional "stable" branch, instead it incorporates all kinds of changes, both the latest features as well as security and bug fixes. For users who do not want to risk updating to new versions containing code that may not be well tested, a separate set of "stable" branches exist, one for each released version, which are meant for people who just want the security and bug fixes, but not a whole new version. These branches are maintained by the stable team (Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chris Wright, and others).
The current development model of the Linux kernel is such that Linus Torvalds makes the releases of new versions, also called the "vanilla" or "mainline" kernels, meaning that they contain the main, generic branch of development. This branch is officially released as a new version approximately every ten weeks, after Torvalds does an initial round of integrating major changes made by all other programmers, and several rounds of bug-fix pre-releases.
As of 7 March 2011, using then-current LOC (lines of code) of a 2.6.x Linux kernel and wage numbers with David A. Wheeler's calculations it would cost approximately $3bn (about €2.2bn) to redevelop the Linux kernel as it keeps getting bigger.
This topic was revisited in October 2008 by Amanda McPherson, Brian Proffitt and Ron Hale-Evans. Using David A. Wheeler's methodology, they estimated redevelopment of the 2.6.25 kernel now costs $1.3bn (part of a total $10.8bn to redevelop Fedora 9). Again, Garcia-Garcia and Alonso de Magdaleno from University of Oviedo (Spain) estimate that the value annually added to kernel was about €100M between 2005 and 2007 and €225M in 2008, it would cost also more than €1bn (about $1.4bn as of February 2010) to develop in the European Union.
The cost to redevelop the Linux kernel version 2.6.0 in a traditional proprietary development setting has been estimated to be US$612 million (€467M, £394M) in 2004 prices using the COCOMO man-month estimation model. In 2006, a study funded by the European Union put the redevelopment cost of kernel version 2.6.8 higher, at €882M ($1.14bn, £744M).
Estimated cost to redevelop
Another important extension to the Linux kernel is the addition of more supported hardware platforms. The architecture of the system supports this extensibility by separating all hardware-specific code into distinct modules within each subsystem. In this way, a small group of developers can implement a port of the Linux kernel to a new hardware architecture by re-implementing only the machine-specific portions of the kernel.
The conceptual architecture of the Linux kernel has proved its success, while essential factors for this success were the provision for the organization of developers, and the provision for system extensibility. The Linux kernel's architecture was required to support a large number of independent volunteer developers, which suggested that the system portions that require the most development—the hardware device drivers and the file and network protocols—be implemented in an extensible fashion. The Linux kernel's architecture chose to make these systems extensible using a data abstraction technique – each hardware device driver is implemented as a separate module that supports a common interface. In this way, a single developer can add a new device driver, with minimal interaction required with other developers of the Linux kernel.
By this statement it is meant that evolution often does odd (and "sub-optimal") things exactly because it does incremental changes which do not break at any point. As a result, any released version of the Linux kernel is fully usable, even if, for example, device drivers do not support all features of the hardware they are written for.
Linux is evolution, not intelligent design—Linus Torvalds, 2005
Instead of a roadmap, there are technical guidelines. Instead of a central resource allocation, there are persons and companies who all have a stake in the further development of the Linux kernel, quite independently from one another: People like Linus Torvalds and I don’t plan the kernel evolution. We don’t sit there and think up the roadmap for the next two years, then assign resources to the various new features. That’s because we don’t have any resources. The resources are all owned by the various corporations who use and contribute to Linux, as well as by the various independent contributors out there. It’s those people who own the resources who decide...—Andrew Morton, 2005
The kernel changes made in year 2007 have been submitted by no less than 1900 developers – but there may be a lot more because developers working in teams usually count as one. It is generally assumed that the community of Linux kernel developers is composed by 5000 or 6000 members; also, as of 2013, the 3.10 release of the Linux kernel had 15,803,499 lines of code. Without smart project management, it would not be possible to maintain development of such a large codebase.
Version 3.11, released on 2 September 2013, adds many new features such as new
O_TMPFILE flag for to reduce temporary file vulnerabilities, experimental AMD Radeon dynamic power management, low-latency network polling, and zswap (compressed swap cache).
In December 2012, Torvalds decided to reduce kernel complexity by removing support for i386 processors, making the 3.7 kernel series the last one still supporting the original processor. The same series unified support for the ARM processor.
Version 3.0 was released on 22 July 2011. Torvalds announced that the big change was, "NOTHING. Absolutely nothing." 30 May 2011 saw Torvalds announce, "...let's make sure we really make the next release not just an all new shiny number, but a good kernel too." After the expected 6–7 week development process, it would be released near the 20th anniversary of Linux.
Version 2.6.0 was released on 18 December 2003. The development for 2.6.x changed further towards including new features throughout the duration of the series. Among the changes that have been made in the 2.6 series are: integration of kernel.org.
Version 2.4.0, released on 4 January 2001, contained support for ISA Plug and Play, USB, and PC Cards. It also included support for the PA-RISC processor from Hewlett-Packard. Development for 2.4.x changed a bit in that more features were made available throughout the duration of the series, including: support for Bluetooth, Logical Volume Manager (LVM) version 1, RAID support, InterMezzo and ext3 file systems.
Version 2.2 (released 26 January 1999) removed the global spinlock and provided improved SMP support, and added support for the m68k and PowerPC architectures as well as new file systems (including read-only support for Microsoft’s NTFS).
Version 2.0 was released 9 June 1996. There were 41 releases in the series. The major feature of 2.0 was SMP support (that is, support for multiple processors in a single system) and support for more types of processors.
Version 1.0 of the Linux kernel was released on 14 March 1994. This release of the Linux kernel only supported single-processor i386-based computer systems. Portability became a concern, and so version 1.2 (released 7 March 1995) gained support for computer systems using processors based on the Alpha, SPARC, and MIPS architectures.
Long term releases with constant security updates are also available for most distributions. Reboot-less security updates can even be applied to the kernel by using technologies such as ksplice.
Raw hardware devices are protected from direct access, and the file system has an inbuilt security system giving individual access to files on three levels, user only, group membership, and world access.
At times, bugs have been corrected in Linux before other systems. In May 2012, a difference between the implementations of the
SYSRET instruction in AMD and Intel processors was found to cause vulnerabilities in major systems such as Windows, FreeBSD, XenServer, and Solaris. The issue had been fixed in the Linux kernel since 2006.
Critics have accused kernel developers of covering up security flaws or at least not announcing them. In response, in 2008, Linus Torvalds replied, "I personally consider security bugs to be just 'normal bugs'. I don't cover them up, but I also don't have any reason what-so-ever to think it's a good idea to track them and announce them as something special...one reason I refuse to bother with the whole security circus is that I think it glorifies—and thus encourages—the wrong behavior. It makes 'heroes' out of security people, as if the people who don't just fix normal bugs aren't as important. In fact, all the boring normal bugs are way more important, just because there's a lot more of them. I don't think some spectacular security hole should be glorified or cared about as being any more 'special' than a random spectacular crash due to bad locking."
Computer security is a much-publicized topic in relation to the Linux kernel, because a large number of bugs in the kernel can be potential security flaws, whether they allow privilege escalation or create denial-of-service attack vectors. Over the years, numerous such flaws were found and fixed in the Linux kernel. New security features are continuously implemented to address computer insecurity issues in the Linux kernel.