Three-domain system

Three-domain system

A phylogenetic tree based on rRNA data, showing the separation of bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes

The three-domain system is a biological classification introduced by Carl Woese et al. in 1977[1][2] that divides cellular life forms into archaea, bacteria, and eukaryote domains. In particular, it emphasizes the separation of prokaryotes into two groups, originally called Eubacteria (now Bacteria) and Archaebacteria (now Archaea). Woese argued that, on the basis of differences in 16S rRNA genes, these two groups and the eukaryotes each arose separately from an ancestor with poorly developed genetic machinery, often called a progenote. To reflect these primary lines of descent, he treated each as a domain, divided into several different kingdoms. Woese initially used the term "kingdom" to refer to the three primary phylogenic groupings, and this nomenclature was widely used until the term "domains" was adopted in 1990.[2]

Contents

  • Classification 1
  • Niches 2
  • Criticism 3
  • See also 4
  • References 5

Classification

Australian green tree frog (Litoria caerulea)
Scanning electron micrograph of S. aureus; false color added
Electron micrograph of Sulfolobus infected with Sulfolobus virus STSV1.
The three-domain system includes Eukarya (represented by the Australian green tree frog, left), Bacteria (represented by S. aureus, middle) and Archaea (represented by Sulfolobus, right)

The three-domain system adds a level of classification (the domains) "above" the kingdoms present in the previously used five-or-six-kingdom systems. This classification system recognizes the fundamental divide between the two prokaryotic groups, insofar as archaea appear to be more closely related to eukaryotes than they are to other prokaryotic bacteria. The current system has the following listed kingdoms in the three domains:

methanogens which produce the gas methane, halophiles which live in very salty water, and thermoacidophiles which thrive in acidic high temperature water.

prokaryotes and eukaryotes",[4] with features of both.

Niches

Each of the three cell types tends to fit into recurring specialties or roles. Bacteria tend to be the most prolific reproducers, at least in moderate environments. Archaeans tend to adapt quickly to extreme environments, such as high temperatures, high acids, high sulfur, etc. This includes adapting to use a wide variety of food sources. Eukaryotes are the most flexible with regard to forming cooperative colonies, such as in multi-cellular organisms, including humans. In fact, the structure of a Eukaryote is likely to have derived from a joining of different cell types, forming organelles.

Criticism

Parts of the three-domain theory have been challenged by some scientists, including Ernst Mayr, Thomas Cavalier-Smith and Radhey Gupta.[5][6][7] In particular, Gupta argues that the primary division within prokaryotes should be among those surrounded by a single membrane (monoderm), including gram-positive bacteria and archaebacteria, and those with an inner and outer cell membrane (diderm), including gram-negative bacteria. He claims that sequence of features and phylogenies from some highly conserved proteins are inconsistent with the three-domain theory, and that it should be abandoned despite its widespread acceptance.

See also

References

  1. ^ Woese C, Fox G (1977). "Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms.". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74 (11): 5088–90.  
  2. ^ a b Woese C, Kandler O, Wheelis M (1990). "Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya.". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87 (12): 4576–9.  
  3. ^ Eckburg, Paul B.; Lepp, Paul W.; Relman, David A. (2003). "Archaea and Their Potential Role in Human Disease". Infection and Immunity 71 (2): 591–596.  
  4. ^ Yamaguchi M, Mori Y, Kozuka Y, Okada H, Uematsu K, Tame A, Furukawa H, Maruyama T, Worman CO, Yokoyama K. (2012). "Prokaryote or eukaryote? A unique microorganism from the deep sea.". J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 61 (6): 423–431.  
  5. ^ Gupta, Radhey S (1998). "Life's Third Domain (Archaea)". : An Established Fact or an Endangered Paradigm?: A New Proposal for Classification of Organisms Based on Protein Sequences and Cell Structure." Theoretical Population Biology 54 (2): 91–104.  
  6. ^ Mayr, E. (1998). "Two empires or three?". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 9720–9723. 
  7. ^ Cavalier-Smith, T (2002). "The neomuran origin of archaebacteria, the negibacterial root of the universal tree and bacterial megaclassification". Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52 (1): 7–76. 

  • Arthropoda – includes insects, arachnids, and crustaceans
  • Chordata – includes vertebrates and, as such, human beings

Domain Eukaryaeukaryotes, organisms that contain a membrane bound nucleus. An inexhaustive list of eukaryotic organisms includes:

which is present in the human large intestine. Bifidobacterium animalis bacteria including Gram-positiveFirmicutes bacteria that include those causing syphilis and Lyme disease, and Gram-negativeSpirochaetes photosynthesizing bacteria that are related to the chloroplasts of eukaryotic plants and algae, Cyanobacteria for exceptions), and are currently studied more extensively than Archaea. Some examples of bacteria include [3]