Polaron
Condensed matter physics 

Phases · Phase transition 
Phase phenomena

Electronic phases

Electronic phenomena

Magnetic phases

Energy spectrum of an electron moving in a periodical potential of rigid crystal lattice consists of allowed and forbidden bands and is known as the Bloch spectrum. An electron with energy inside an allowed band moves as a free electron but with effective mass (solidstate physics) that differs from the electron mass in vacuum. However, crystal lattice is deformable and displacements of atoms (ions) from their equilibrium positions are described in terms of phonons. Electrons interact with these displacements, and this interaction is known as electronphonon coupling. One of possible scenarios was proposed in the seminal 1933 paper by Lev Landau, it includes production of a lattice defect such as an Fcenter and trapping the electron by this defect. A different scenario was proposed by Solomon Pekar that envisions dressing the electron with lattice deformation (a cloud of virtual phonons). Such an electron with the accompanying deformation moves freely across the crystal, but with increased effective mass.^{[1]} Pekar coined for this charge carrier the term polaron.
The general concept of a polaron has been extended to describe other interactions between the electrons and ions in metals that result in a bound state, or a lowering of energy compared to the noninteracting system. Major theoretical work has focused on solving Fröhlich and Holstein Hamiltonians. This is still an active field of research to find exact numerical solutions to the case of one or two electrons in a large crystal lattice, and to study the case of many interacting electrons.
Experimentally, polarons are important to the understanding of a wide variety of materials. The electron mobility in cooper pairs in typeI superconductors can also be modelled as a polaron, and two opposite spin electrons may form a bipolaron sharing a phonon cloud. This has been suggested as a mechanism for cooper pair formation in typeII superconductors. Polarons are also important for interpreting the optical conductivity of these types of materials.
The polaron, a fermionic quasiparticle, should not be confused with the polariton, a bosonic quasiparticle analogous to a hybridized state between a photon and an optical phonon.
Contents
 Polaron theory 1
 Polaron optical absorption 2
 Polarons in two dimensions and in quasi2D structures 3
 Extensions of the polaron concept 4
 See also 5
 References 6
 External links 7
Polaron theory
L. D. Landau ^{[2]} and S. I. Pekar ^{[3]} formed the basis of polaron theory. A charge placed in a polarizable medium will be screened. Dielectric theory describes the phenomenon by the induction of a polarization around the charge carrier. The induced polarization will follow the charge carrier when it is moving through the medium. The carrier together with the induced polarization is considered as one entity, which is called a polaron (see Fig. 1).
Material  α  Material  α 

InSb  0.023  KI  2.5 
InAs  0.052  TlBr  2.55 
GaAs  0.068  KBr  3.05 
GaP  0.20  RbI  3.16 
CdTe  0.29  Bi_{12}SiO_{20}  3.18 
ZnSe  0.43  CdF_{2}  3.2 
CdS  0.53  KCl  3.44 
AgBr  1.53  CsI  3.67 
AgCl  1.84  SrTiO_{3}  3.77 
αAl_{2}O_{3}  2.40  RbCl  3.81 
A conduction electron in an ionic crystal or a polar semiconductor is the prototype of a polaron. Herbert Fröhlich proposed a model Hamiltonian for this polaron through which its dynamics are treated quantum mechanically (Fröhlich Hamiltonian).^{[6]}^{[7]} This model assumes that electron wavefunction is spread out over many ions which are all somewhat displaced from their equilibrium positions, or the continuum approximation. The strength of the electronphonon interaction is expressed by a dimensionless coupling constant α introduced by Fröhlich.^{[7]} In Table 1 the Fröhlich coupling constant is given for a few solids. The Fröhlich Hamiltonian for a single electron in a crystal using second quantization notation is: H = H_{e} + H_{ph} + H_{eph}
H_{e} = \sum_{k,s} \xi(k,s) c_{k,s}^{\dagger} c_{k,s}
H_{ph} = \sum_{q,v} \omega_{q,v} a_{q,v}^{\dagger} a_{q,v}
H_{eph} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2N} } \sum_{k,s,q,v} \gamma(\alpha , q , k , v ) \omega_{qv} ( c_{k ,s}^{\dagger} c_{kq , s} a_{q,v} + c_{kq ,s}^{\dagger} c_{k , s} a^{\dagger}_{q,v} )
The exact form of gamma depends on the material and the type of phonon being used in the model. A detailed advanced discussion of the variations of the Fröhlich Hamiltonian can be found in J. T. Devreese and A. S. Alexandrov ^{[8]} The terms Fröhlich polaron and large polaron are sometimes used synonymously, since the Fröhlich Hamiltonian includes the continuum approximation and long range forces. There is no known exact solution for the Fröhlich Hamiltonian with longitudinal optical (LO) phonons and linear \gamma (the most commonly considered variant of the Fröhlich polaron) despite extensive investigations.^{[3]}^{[5]}^{[6]}^{[7]}^{[9]}^{[10]}^{[11]}^{[12]}^{[13]}^{[14]}
Despite the lack of an exact solution, some approximations of the polaron properties are known.
The physical properties of a polaron differ from those of a bandcarrier. A polaron is characterized by its selfenergy \Delta E, an effective mass m* and by its characteristic response to external electric and magnetic fields (e. g. dc mobility and optical absorption coefficient).
When the coupling is weak (\alpha small), the selfenergy of the polaron can be approximated as:^{[15]}
\frac{\Delta E}{\hbar\omega } \approx \alpha 0.015919622\alpha^2,  (1)\, 
and the polaron mass m*, which can be measured by cyclotron resonance experiments, is larger than the band mass m of the charge carrier without selfinduced polarization:^{[16]}
\frac{m^*}{m} \approx 1+\frac{\alpha}{6}+0.0236\alpha^2.  (2)\, 
When the coupling is strong (α large), a variational approach due to Landau and Pekar indicates that the selfenergy is proportional to α² and the polaron mass scales as α⁴. The LandauPekar variational calculation ^{[3]} yields an upper bound to the polaron selfenergy E < C_{PL} \alpha^2 , valid for all α, where C_{PL} is a constant determined by solving an integrodifferential equation. It was an open question for many years whether this expression was asymptotically exact as α tends to infinity. Finally, Donsker and Varadhan,^{[17]} applying large deviation theory to Feynman's path integral formulation for the selfenergy, showed the large α exactitude of this LandauPekar formula. Later, Lieb and Thomas ^{[18]} gave a shorter proof using more conventional methods, and with explicit bounds on the lower order corrections to the LandauPekar formula.
Feynman ^{[19]} introduced a variational principle for path integrals to study the polaron. He simulated the interaction between the electron and the polarization modes by a harmonic interaction between a hypothetical particle and the electron. The analysis of an exactly solvable ("symmetrical") 1Dpolaron model,^{[20]}^{[21]} Monte Carlo schemes ^{[22]}^{[23]} and other numerical schemes ^{[24]} demonstrate the remarkable accuracy of Feynman's pathintegral approach to the polaron groundstate energy. Experimentally more directly accessible properties of the polaron, such as its mobility and optical absorption, have been investigated subsequently.
In the strong coupling limit, \alpha>>1, the spectrum of excited states of a polaron begins with polaronphonon bound states with energies less than \hbar\omega_0, where \omega_0 is the frequency of optical phonons.^{[25]}
Polaron optical absorption
The expression for the magnetooptical absorption of a polaron is:^{[26]}
\Gamma(\Omega) \propto \frac{\mathrm{Im} \Sigma(\Omega)}{\left[\Omega\omega_{\mathrm{c}}\mathrm{Re} \Sigma(\Omega)\right]^2 + \left[\mathrm{Im}\Sigma(\Omega)\right]^2} .  (3)\, 
Here, \omega_{c} is the cyclotron frequency for a rigidband electron. The magnetooptical absorption Γ(Ω) at the frequency Ω takes the form Σ(Ω) is the socalled "memory function", which describes the dynamics of the polaron. Σ(Ω) depends also on α, β _{what is beta?} and \omega_{c}.
In the absence of an external magnetic field (\omega_{c}=0) the optical absorption spectrum (3) of the polaron at weak coupling is determined by the absorption of radiation energy, which is reemitted in the form of LO phonons. At larger coupling, \alpha \ge 5.9, the polaron can undergo transitions toward a relatively stable internal excited state called the "relaxed excited state" (RES) (see Fig. 2). The RES peak in the spectrum also has a phonon sideband, which is related to a FranckCondontype transition.
A comparison of the DSG results ^{[27]} with the optical conductivity spectra given by approximationfree numerical ^{[28]} and approximate analytical approaches is given in ref.^{[29]}
Calculations of the optical conductivity for the Fröhlich polaron performed within the Diagrammatic Quantum Monte Carlo method,^{[28]} see Fig. 3, fully confirm the results of the pathintegral variational approach ^{[27]} at \alpha \lesssim 3. In the intermediate coupling regime 3<\alpha <6, the lowenergy behavior and the position of the maximum of the optical conductivity spectrum of ref.^{[28]} follow well the prediction of ref.^{[27]} There are the following qualitative differences between the two approaches in the intermediate and strong coupling regime: in ref.,^{[28]} the dominant peak broadens and the second peak does not develop, giving instead rise to a flat shoulder in the optical conductivity spectrum at \alpha =6. This behavior can be attributed to the optical processes with participation of two ^{[30]} or more phonons. The nature of the excited states of a polaron needs further study.
The application of a sufficiently strong external magnetic field allows one to satisfy the resonance condition \Omega =\omega _{\mathrm{c}}+\mathrm{Re} \Sigma (\Omega ), which {(for \omega_c < \omega)} determines the polaron cyclotron resonance frequency. From this condition also the polaron cyclotron mass can be derived. Using the most accurate theoretical polaron models to evaluate \Sigma (\Omega ), the experimental cyclotron data can be well accounted for.
Evidence for the polaron character of charge carriers in AgBr and AgCl was obtained through highprecision cyclotron resonance experiments in external magnetic fields up to 16 T.^{[31]} The allcoupling magnetoabsorption calculated in ref.,^{[26]} leads to the best quantitative agreement between theory and experiment for AgBr and AgCl. This quantitative interpretation of the cyclotron resonance experiment in AgBr and AgCl ^{[31]} by the theory of ref.^{[26]} provided one of the most convincing and clearest demonstrations of Fröhlich polaron features in solids.
Experimental data on the magnetopolaron effect, obtained using farinfrared photoconductivity techniques, have been applied to study the energy spectrum of shallow donors in polar semiconductor layers of CdTe.^{[32]}
The polaron effect well above the LO phonon energy was studied through cyclotron resonance measurements, e. g., in IIVI semiconductors, observed in ultrahigh magnetic fields.^{[33]} The resonant polaron effect manifests itself when the cyclotron frequency approaches the LO phonon energy in sufficiently high magnetic fields.
Polarons in two dimensions and in quasi2D structures
The great interest in the study of the twodimensional electron gas (2DEG) has also resulted in many investigations on the properties of polarons in two dimensions.^{[34]}^{[35]}^{[36]} A simple model for the 2D polaron system consists of an electron confined to a plane, interacting via the Fröhlich interaction with the LO phonons of a 3D surrounding medium. The selfenergy and the mass of such a 2D polaron are no longer described by the expressions valid in 3D; for weak coupling they can be approximated as:^{[37]}^{[38]}
\frac{\Delta E}{\hbar \omega} \approx \frac{\pi}{2}\alpha\  0.06397\alpha^2;  (4)\, 
\frac{m^*}{m} \approx 1+\frac{\pi}{8}\alpha\ + 0.1272348\alpha^2.  (5)\, 
It has been shown that simple scaling relations exist, connecting the physical properties of polarons in 2D with those in 3D. An example of such a scaling relation is:^{[36]}
\frac{m^{*}_{2D}(\alpha)}{m_{2D}}=\frac{m^{*}_{3D}(\frac{3}{4}\pi\alpha)}{m_{3D}} ,  (6)\, 
where m_\mathrm{2D}^* (m_\mathrm{3D}^*) and m_\mathrm{2D}^{} (m_\mathrm{3D}^{}) are, respectively, the polaron and the electronband masses in 2D (3D).
The effect of the confinement of a Fröhlich polaron is to enhance the effective polaron coupling. However, manyparticle effects tend to counterbalance this effect because of screening.^{[34]}^{[39]}
Also in 2D systems cyclotron resonance is a convenient tool to study polaron effects. Although several other effects have to be taken into account (nonparabolicity of the electron bands, manybody effects, the nature of the confining potential, etc.), the polaron effect is clearly revealed in the cyclotron mass. An interesting 2D system consists of electrons on films of liquid He.^{[40]}^{[41]} In this system the electrons couple to the ripplons of the liquid He, forming "ripplopolarons". The effective coupling can be relatively large and, for some values of the parameters, selftrapping can result. The acoustic nature of the ripplon dispersion at long wavelengths is a key aspect of the trapping.
For GaAs/Al_{x}Ga_{1x}As quantum wells and superlattices, the polaron effect is found to decrease the energy of the shallow donor states at low magnetic fields and leads to a resonant splitting of the energies at high magnetic fields. The energy spectra of such polaronic systems as shallow donors ("bound polarons"), e. g., the D_{0} and D^{−} centres, constitute the most complete and detailed polaron spectroscopy realised in the literature.^{[42]}
In GaAs/AlAs quantum wells with sufficiently high electron density, anticrossing of the cyclotronresonance spectra has been observed near the GaAs transverse optical (TO) phonon frequency rather than near the GaAs LOphonon frequency.^{[43]} This anticrossing near the TOphonon frequency was explained in the framework of the polaron theory.^{[43]}
Besides optical properties,^{[5]}^{[13]}^{[44]} many other physical properties of polarons have been studied, including the possibility of selftrapping, polaron transport,^{[45]} magnetophonon resonance, etc.
Extensions of the polaron concept
Significant are also the extensions of the polaron concept: acoustic polaron, piezoelectric polaron, electronic polaron, bound polaron, trapped polaron, spin polaron, molecular polaron, solvated polarons, polaronic exciton, JahnTeller polaron, small polaron, bipolarons and manypolaron systems.^{[5]} These extensions of the concept are invoked, e. g., to study the properties of conjugated polymers, colossal magnetoresistance perovskites, highT_{c} superconductors, layered MgB_{2} superconductors, fullerenes, quasi1D conductors, semiconductor nanostructures.
The possibility that polarons and bipolarons play a role in highT_{c} superconductors has renewed interest in the physical properties of manypolaron systems and, in particular, in their optical properties. Theoretical treatments have been extended from onepolaron to manypolaron systems.^{[5]}^{[46]}^{[47]}
A new aspect of the polaron concept has been investigated for semiconductor nanostructures: the excitonphonon states are not factorizable into an adiabatic product Ansatz, so that a nonadiabatic treatment is needed.^{[48]} The nonadiabaticity of the excitonphonon systems leads to a strong enhancement of the phononassisted transition probabilities (as compared to those treated adiabatically) and to multiphonon optical spectra that are considerably different from the FranckCondon progression even for small values of the electronphonon coupling constant as is the case for typical semiconductor nanostructures.^{[48]}
In biophysics Davydov soliton is a propagating along the protein αhelix selftrapped amide I excitation that is a solution of the Davydov Hamiltonian. The mathematical techniques that are used to analyze Davydov's soliton are similar to some that have been developed in polaron theory. In this context the Davydov soliton corresponds to a polaron that is (i) large so the continuum limit approximation in justified, (ii) acoustic because the selflocalization arises from interactions with acoustic modes of the lattice, and (iii) weakly coupled because the anharmonic energy is small compared with the phonon bandwidth.^{[49]}
More recently it was shown that the system of an impurity in a Bose–Einstein condensate is also a member of the polaron family.^{[50]} This is very promising for experimentally probing the hitherto inaccessible strong coupling regime since in this case interaction strengths can be externally tuned through the use of a Feshbach resonance.
See also
References
 ^ L. D. Landau and S. I. Pekar, Effective mass of a polaron, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 18, 419–423 (1948) [in Russian], English translation: Ukr. J. Phys., Special Issue, 53, p.7174 (2008), http://ujp.bitp.kiev.ua/files/journals/53/si/53SI15p.pdf
 ^ Landau LD (1933). "Über die Bewegung der Elektronen in Kristalgitter". Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 3: 644–645.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} Pekar SI (1951). "Issledovanija po Elektronnoj Teorii Kristallov". Gostekhizdat, Moskva.. English translation: Research in Electron Theory of Crystals, AECtr555, US Atomic Energy Commission (1963)
 ^
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} ^{d} ^{e}
 ^ ^{a} ^{b}
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c}
 ^ J. T. Devreese & A. S. Alexandrov (2009). "Fröhlich polaron and bipolaron: recent developments". Rep. Prog. Phys. 72 (6): 066501.
 ^ Kuper GC; Whitfield GD, eds. (1963). "Polarons and Excitons". Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
 ^ Appel J (1968). "Polarons". In: Solid State Physics, F. Seitz, D. Turnbull, and H. Ehrenreich (eds.), Academic Press, New York 21: pp.193–391.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b}
 ^ Mitra TK; Chatterjee A; Mukhopadhyay S (1987). "Polarons". Phys. Rep. 153 (2–3): 91.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b}
 ^ Alexandrov AS; Mott N (1996). "Polarons and Bipolarons". World Scientific, Singapore.
 ^ Smondyrev MA (1986). "Diagrams in the polaron model". Theor. Math. Phys. 68 (1): 653.
 ^ Röseler J (1968). "A new variational ansatz in the polaron theory". Physica Status Solidi (b) 25 (1): 311.
 ^ M. Donsker and R.Varadhan(1983). "Asymptotics for the Polaron", Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 36, 505–528.
 ^ Lieb E.H.; Thomas L.E. (1997). "Exact Ground State Energy of the Strong Coupling Polaron". Commun. Math. Physics 183 (3): 511–519.
 ^
 ^
 ^
 ^ Mishchenko AS; Prokof'ev NV; Sakamoto A; Svistunov BV (2000). "Diagrammatic quantum Monte Carlo study of the Fröhlich polaron". Phys. Rev. B 62 (10): 6317.
 ^ Titantah JT; Pierleoni C; Ciuchi S (2001). "Free Energy of the Fröhlich Polaron in Two and Three Dimensions". Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (20): 206406.
 ^ De Filippis G; Cataudella V; Marigliano Ramaglia V; Perroni CA; et al. (2003). "Ground state features of the Fröhlich model". Eur. Phys. J. B 36 (1): 65.
 ^ V. I. Mel'nikov and E. I. Rashba. ZhETF Pis Red., 10 1969, 95, 359 (1959), JETP Lett 10, 60 (1969). http://www.jetpletters.ac.ru/ps/1687/article_25692.pdf
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} Peeters FM;
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} ^{d} ^{e}
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} ^{d} ^{e} Mishchenko AS; Nagaosa N; Prokof'ev NV; Sakamoto A; et al. (2003). "Optical Conductivity of the Fröhlich Polaron". Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (23): 236401.
 ^ De Filippis G; Cataudella V; Mishchenko AS; Perroni CA; et al. (2006). "Validity of the FranckCondon Principle in the Optical Spectroscopy: Optical Conductivity of the Fröhlich Polaron". Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (13): 136405.
 ^ Goovaerts MJ; De Sitter J;
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Hodby JW; Russell GP; Peeters F;
 ^ Grynberg M; Huant S; Martinez G; Kossut J; et al. (15 July 1996). "Magnetopolaron effect on shallow indium donors in CdTe". Physical Review BCondensed Matter (APS) 54 (3): 1467–70.
 ^ Miura N; Imanaka Y (2003). "Polaron cyclotron resonance in II–VI compounds at high magnetic fields". Physica Status Solidi (b) 237 (1): 237.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b}
 ^ Wu XG; Peeters FM;
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Peeters FM;
 ^ Sak J (1972). "Theory of Surface Polarons". Phys. Rev. B 6 (10): 3981.
 ^ Peeters FM; Wu XG;
 ^ Das Sarma S; Mason BA (1985). "Optical phonon interaction effects in layered semiconductor structures". Ann. Phys. (New York) 163 (1): 78.
 ^ Shikin VB; Monarkha YP (1973). Sov. Phys. – JETP 38: 373.
 ^ Jackson SA; Platzman PM (1981). "Polaronic aspects of twodimensional electrons on films of liquid He". Phys. Rev. B 24 (1): 499.
 ^ Shi JM; Peeters FM;
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Poulter AJL; Zeman J; Maude DK; Potemski M; et al. (2001). "Magneto Infrared Absorption in High Electron Density GaAs Quantum Wells". Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2): 336–9.
 ^ Calvani P (2001). "Optical Properties of Polarons". Editrice Compositori, Bologna.
 ^ Feynman RP; Hellwarth RW; Iddings CK; Platzman PM (1962). "Mobility of Slow Electrons in a Polar Crystal". Phys. Rev. 127 (4): 1004.
 ^ Bassani FG; Cataudella V; Chiofalo ML; De Filippis G; et al. (2003). "Electron gas with polaronic effects: beyond the meanfield theory". Physica Status Solidi (b) 237 (1): 173.
 ^ Hohenadler M; Hager G; Wellein G; Fehske H (2007). "Carrierdensity effects in manypolaron systems". J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 (25): 255210.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Fomin VM; Gladilin VN;
 ^ Scott AS (1992). "Davydov's soliton". Physics Reports 217 (1): 1–67.
 ^ Tempere J; Casteels W; Oberthaler M; Knoop S; et al. (2009). "Feynman pathintegral treatment of the BECimpurity polaron". Phys. Rev. B 80 (18): 184504.
External links
