National Voter Registration Act of 1993
|Long title||An Act to establish national voter registration procedures for Federal elections, and for other purposes.|
|Nicknames||National Voter Registration Act, Motor Voter|
|Enacted by||the 103rd United States Congress|
|Effective||January 1, 1995|
|Statutes at Large||107 Stat. 77|
|Titles amended||Title 42: Public Health and Social Welfare|
|U.S.C. sections created||42 U.S.C. §§ 1973gg–1973gg-10|
The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) (52 U.S.C. § 20501 - 52 U.S.C. § 20511) (formerly 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973gg–1973gg-10), also known as The Motor Voter Act, is a piece of federal legislation in the United States that was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on May 20, 1993, and began to take effect on January 1, 1995. The law expanded voting rights by requiring state governments to offer voter registration opportunities to any eligible person who applies for or renews a driver's license or public assistance, requiring states to register applicants that use a federal voter registration form to apply, and prohibiting states from removing registered voters from the voter rolls unless certain criteria are met.
- Background 1
- Legislative history 2
- Purposes and scope 3.1
- Voter registration of driver's license applicants 3.2
- Voter registration agencies 3.3
- Mail voter registration 3.4
- Federal voter registration form 3.5
- Voter list maintenance 3.6
- Enforcement 3.7
- Impact 4
- References 5
- External links 6
After Congress enacted the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to address rampant voting discrimination against racial minorities, voting rights advocates began pushing for federal legislation to remove remaining barriers to voter registration. However, initial legislative efforts to create national voter registration standards for federal elections failed. In the early 1970s, Congress considered several legislative proposals to require the U.S. Census Bureau to mail voter registration forms to every household, none of which passed. In the mid and late 1970s, legislative proposals to require certain public agency offices to make voter registration forms available and to require states to allow Election Day voter registration failed. Similar bills introduced throughout the 1980s also failed.:1–2
Nonetheless, Congress did pass two pieces of legislation in the 1980s that made voter registration for federal elections more accessible for certain disadvantaged populations. In 1984, Congress passed the Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act, which requires that states make available to elderly and handicapped voters "a reasonable number of accessible permanent registration facilities" and registration aids, and the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (1986) required states to mail federal voter registration forms to overseas and military voters and permit them to register by mail.:2
In light of low voter turnout in federal elections throughout the 1980s, Congress returned its attention to creating general voter registration standards in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Members of Congress introduced a series of "motor voter" bills that would require state motor vehicle agencies to offer voter registration opportunities to clients applying for driver's licenses. The first of these bills, the National Voter Registration Act of 1989, passed in the House of Representatives with bipartisan support, but it stalled in the Senate. A similar bill, the National Voter Registration Act of 1991, gained less bipartisan support; it passed in both the Senate and the House, but it was vetoed by President
- ARIZONA ET AL. v. INTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF ARIZONA, INC., ET AL.
- Senate roll call vote
- House roll call vote
- Full text of statute from United States Department of Justice
- The National Voter Registration Act of 1993: History, Implementation, and Effects Congressional Research Service
- Charles H. Wesley Education Foundation v. Cathy Cox.
- This article incorporates public domain material from the Congressional Research Service document "The National Voter Registration Act of 1993: History, Implementation, and Effects" by Crocker, Royce (September 8, 2013) (retrieved on June 8, 2014).
- Gemmiti, Nathan V. (January 1, 1998). iss1/4 "Porsche or Pinto? The Impact of the "Motor Voter Registration Act" on Black Political Participation" . Boston College Third World Law Journal 18 (1). Retrieved June 8, 2014.
- Rogers, Estelle H. (2009). "The National Voter Registration Act at Fifteen" (PDF). Project Vote. Retrieved June 2, 2014.
- "National Voter Registration Act of 1993 § 2(b) (
- Shordt, Richard F. (February 2010). "Not Registered to Vote? Sign This, Mail It, and Go Hire a Lawyer" (PDF). George Washington Law Review (78). Retrieved June 2, 2014.
- Wolfinger, Raymond E.; Hoffman, Jonathan (March 2001). "Registering and Voting with Motor Voter". Political Science and Politics (American Political Science Association) 34 (1): 85–92.
- Cox Violated Voter Rights, Judge Declares
- One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication in the public domain: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-71_7l48.pdf
- "Background on Delgado v. Galvin Interim Settlement" (Press release). Demos. 2012-08-09. Retrieved 2012-08-09.
Voting rights organizations have contended that some states have not been living up to responsibilities mandated by the National Voter Registration Act. In several states, organizations such as Demos, Project Vote, and Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law have filed lawsuits or sent pre-litigation letters. In some of these cases, this has resulted in changes in compliance by states.
Voter list maintenance
On June 17, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Arizona in the case Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Ariz., Inc.. The Court held the NVRA preempted a 2004 Arizona proposition, Proposition 200. It was a ballot initiative designed in part "to combat voter fraud by requiring voters to present proof of citizenship when they register to vote and to present identification when they vote on election day." Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U. S. 1, 2 (2006) (per curiam). It was a 7-2 decision striking down the law. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the majority opinion. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.
 The NVRA requires States to "accept and use" a uniform federal form to register voters for federal elections. 42 U. S. C. §1973gg–4(a)(1). That "Federal Form," developed by the federal
Federal voter registration form
 In 2004, the Nu Mu Lambda chapter of
Section 6 allows for more accessible voter registration through mail voter registration.
Mail voter registration
The Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP) is responsible for administering NVRA for U.S. citizens abroad. FVAP allows eligible citizens to register to vote at 6000 Armed Forces Recruitment Offices nationwide.
Section 7 requires that states offer individuals who apply for "agency based" needs such as food stamps, disability services, and other social services the opportunity to register to vote during the application process.
Voter registration agencies
Section 5 requires state motor vehicle offices to provide voter registration opportunities to anyone applying for a new or renewed driver's license or state identification card. The Act reduces costs of voting registration by accumulating individual data when applying for a drivers license or receiving social assistance. The "motor voter" nickname came from the idea that most of the NVRA data was accumulated from applicants renewing or obtaining driver's licenses.
Voter registration of driver's license applicants
The Act's provisions formally apply only to federal elections; however, because states have unified their voter registration systems for state and federal elections, the provisions functionally apply to both state and federal elections.:5–6 The Act exempts from its requirements states that, continuously since March 11, 1993, have not required voter registration for federal elections or have offered Election Day voter registration for federal general elections. Six states satisfy these exemption requirements: North Dakota is exempt for having continuously allowed its residents to vote in federal elections without registering, while Idaho, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Wisconsin, and Wyoming have continuously offered Election Day voter registration for federal general elections.:444
- To increase the number of registered voters;
- To enhance voter participation;
- To protect election integrity; and
- To ensure states maintain accurate voter rolls.:5
As described in Section 2, the Act has four purposes:
Purposes and scope