|Antarctic Treaty System|
|Drafted||the antarctic treaty system does have endftersesodiusment.|
|Depositary||Government of the United States of America|
|Languages||English, French, Russian, and Spanish|
|Antarctic Treaty at Wikisource|
The Antarctic Treaty and related agreements, collectively known as the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS), regulate international relations with respect to Antarctica, Earth's only continent without a native human population. For the purposes of the treaty system, Antarctica is defined as all of the land and ice shelves south of 60°S latitude. The treaty, entering into force in 1961 and as of 2015 having 53 parties, sets aside Antarctica as a scientific preserve, establishes freedom of scientific investigation and bans military activity on that continent. The treaty was the first arms control agreement established during the Cold War. The Antarctic Treaty Secretariat headquarters have been located in Buenos Aires, Argentina, since September 2004.
|International ownership treaties|
The main treaty was opened for signature on December 1, 1959, and officially entered into force on June 23, 1961. The original signatories were the 12 countries active in Antarctica during the International Geophysical Year (IGY) of 1957–58. The twelve countries that had significant interests in Antarctica at the time were: Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Chile, France, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, South Africa, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom and the United States. These countries had established over 50 Antarctic stations for the IGY. The treaty was a diplomatic expression of the operational and scientific cooperation that had been achieved "on the ice".
- 1 Articles of the Antarctic Treaty
- Other agreements 2
- Meetings 3
- Parties 4
- Antarctic Treaty Secretariat 5
Legal system 6
- Argentina 6.1
- Australia 6.2
- United States 6.3
- New Zealand 6.4
- South Africa 6.5
- See also 7
- References 8
- External links 9
Articles of the Antarctic Treaty
- Article 1 – The area is to be used for peaceful purposes only; military activity, such as weapons testing, is prohibited but military personnel and equipment may be used for scientific research or any other peaceful purpose;
- Article 2 – The area is closing down
- Article 3 – Free exchange of information and personnel in cooperation with the United Nations and other international agencies;
- Article 4 – The treaty does not recognize, dispute, nor establish territorial sovereignty claims; no new claims shall be asserted while the treaty is in force;
- Article 5 – The treaty prohibits nuclear explosions or disposal of radioactive wastes;
- Article 6 – Includes under the treaty all land and ice shelves but not the surrounding waters south of 60 degrees 00 minutes south;
- Article 7 – Treaty-state observers have free access, including aerial observation, to any area and may inspect all stations, installations, and equipment; advance notice of all activities and of the introduction of military personnel must be given;
- Article 8 – Allows for good jurisdiction over observers and scientists by their own states;
- Article 9 – Frequent consultative meetings take place among member nations;
- Article 10 – All treaty states will discourage activities by any country in Antarctica that are contrary to the treaty;
- Article 11 – All disputes to be settled peacefully by the parties concerned or, ultimately, by the International Court of Justice;
- Articles 12, 13, 14 – Deal with upholding, interpreting, and amending the treaty among involved nations.
The main objective of the ATS is to ensure in the interests of all humankind that Antarctica shall continue forever to be used exclusively for peaceful purposes and shall not become the scene or object of international discord. Pursuant to Article 1, the treaty forbids any measures of a military nature, but not the presence of military personnel or equipment for the purposes of scientific research.
Other agreements — some 200 recommendations adopted at treaty consultative meetings and ratified by governments — include:
- Agreed Measures for the Conservation of Antarctic Fauna and Flora (1964) (entered into force in 1982)
- The Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Seals (1972)
- The Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (1982) 
- The Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities (1988) (signed in 1988, not in force)
- The Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty was signed October 4, 1991 and entered into force January 14, 1998; this agreement prevents development and provides for the protection of the Antarctic environment through five specific annexes on marine pollution, fauna and flora, environmental impact assessments, waste management, and protected areas. It prohibits all activities relating to mineral resources except scientific. A sixth annex — on liability arising from environmental emergencies — was adopted in 2005 but is yet to enter into force.
The Antarctic Treaty System's yearly Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings (ATCM) are the international forum for the administration and management of the region. Only 29 of the 53 parties to the agreements have the right to participate in decision-making at these meetings, though the other 21 are still allowed to attend. The decision-making participants are the Consultative Parties and, in addition to the 12 original signatories, include 17 countries that have demonstrated their interest in Antarctica by carrying out substantial scientific activity there.
As of 2015, there are 53 states party to the treaty, 29 of which, including all 12 original signatories to the treaty, have consultative (voting) status. Consultative members include the seven nations that claim portions of Antarctica as national territory. The 46 non-claimant nations either do not recognize the claims of others, or have not stated their positions.
|Argentina (claim)*||December 1, 1959||June 23, 1961||June 23, 1961|
|Australia (claim)||December 1, 1959||June 23, 1961||June 23, 1961|
|Austria||No||August 25, 1987|
|Belarus||No||December 27, 2006|
|Belgium||December 1, 1959||July 26, 1960||June 23, 1961|
|Brazil||No||May 16, 1975||September 27, 1983|
|Bulgaria||No||September 11, 1978||June 5, 1998|
|Canada||No||May 4, 1988|
|Chile (claim)*||December 1, 1959||June 23, 1961||June 23, 1961|
|China||No||June 8, 1983||October 7, 1985|
|Colombia||No||January 31, 1989|
|Cuba||No||August 16, 1984|
|Czech Republic||No||January 1, 1993||April 1, 2014||Succession from Czechoslovakia, which acceded on June 14, 1962.|
|Denmark||No||May 20, 1965|
|Ecuador||No||September 15, 1987||November 19, 1990|
|Estonia||No||May 17, 2001|
|Finland||No||May 15, 1984||October 20, 1989|
|France (claim)||December 1, 1959||September 16, 1960||June 23, 1961|
|Germany (claim) (rests since 1945)||No||February 5, 1979||March 3, 1981||
Ratified as West Germany.
East Germany also acceded on November 19, 1974 and received consultative status on October 5, 1987 prior to its reunification with West Germany.
|Greece||No||January 8, 1987|
|Guatemala||No||July 31, 1991|
|Hungary||No||January 27, 1984|
|Iceland||No||October 13, 2015|
|India||No||August 19, 1983||September 12, 1983|
|Italy||No||March 18, 1981||October 5, 1987|
|Japan||December 1, 1959||August 4, 1960||June 23, 1961|
|Kazakhstan||No||January 27, 2015|
|Malaysia||No||October 31, 2011|
|Monaco||No||May 31, 2008|
|Mongolia||No||March 23, 2015|
|Netherlands||No||March 30, 1967||November 19, 1990|
|New Zealand (claim)||December 1, 1959||November 1, 1960||June 23, 1961|
|North Korea||No||January 21, 1987|
|Norway (claim)||December 1, 1959||August 24, 1960||June 23, 1961|
|Pakistan||No||March 1, 2012|
|Papua New Guinea||No||March 16, 1981||Succession from Australia. Effective from their independence on September 16, 1975.|
|Peru||No||April 10, 1981||October 9, 1989|
|Poland||No||June 8, 1961||July 29, 1977|
|Portugal||No||January 29, 2010|
|Romania||No||September 15, 1971|
|Russia**||December 1, 1959||November 2, 1960||June 23, 1961||Ratified as the Soviet Union.|
|Slovakia||No||January 1, 1993||Succession from Czechoslovakia, which acceded on June 14, 1962.|
|South Africa||December 1, 1959||June 21, 1960||June 23, 1961|
|South Korea||No||November 28, 1986||October 9, 1989|
|Spain||No||March 31, 1982||September 21, 1988|
|Sweden||No||April 24, 1984||September 21, 1988|
|Switzerland||No||November 15, 1990|
|Turkey||No||January 24, 1996|
|Ukraine||No||October 28, 1992||June 4, 2004|
|United Kingdom (claim)*||December 1, 1959||May 31, 1960||June 23, 1961|
|United States**||December 1, 1959||August 18, 1960||June 23, 1961|
|Uruguay||No||January 11, 1980||October 7, 1985|
|Venezuela||No||May 24, 1999|
* Claims overlap.
** Reserved the right to claim areas.
Antarctic Treaty Secretariat
The Antarctic Treaty Secretariat was established in Buenos Aires, Argentina in September 2004 by the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM). Jan Huber (Netherlands) served as the first Executive Secretary for five years until August 31, 2009. He was succeeded on September 1, 2009 by Manfred Reinke (Germany).
The tasks of the Antarctic Treaty Secretariat can be divided into the following areas:
- Supporting the annual Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM) and the meeting of the Committee for Environmental Protection (CEP).
- Facilitating the exchange of information between the Parties required in the Treaty and the Environment Protocol.
- Collecting, storing, arranging and publishing the documents of the ATCM.
- Providing and disseminating public information about the Antarctic Treaty system and Antarctic activities.
Antarctica has no permanent population and therefore it has no citizenship nor government. All personnel present on Antarctica at any time are citizens or nationals of some sovereignty outside Antarctica, as there is no Antarctic sovereignty. The majority of Antarctica is claimed by one or more countries, but most countries do not explicitly recognize those claims. The area on the mainland between 90 degrees west and 150 degrees west is the only major land on Earth not claimed by any country. Until 2015 the interior of the Norwegian Sector, the extent of which had never been officially defined, was considered to be unclaimed. That year, Norway formally laid claim to the area between its Queen Maud Land and the South Pole.
Governments that are party to the Antarctic Treaty and its Protocol on Environmental Protection implement the articles of these agreements, and decisions taken under them, through national laws. These laws generally apply only to their own citizens, wherever they are in Antarctica, and serve to enforce the consensus decisions of the consultative parties: about which activities are acceptable, which areas require permits to enter, what processes of environmental impact assessment must precede activities, and so on. The Antarctic Treaty is often considered to represent an example of the Common heritage of mankind principle.
According to Argentine regulations, any crime committed within 50 kilometers of any Argentine base is to be judged in Ushuaia (as capital of Tierra del Fuego, Antarctica, and South Atlantic Islands). In the part of Argentine Antarctica that is also claimed by Chile and UK, the person to be judged can ask to be transferred there.
Since the designation of the Australian Antarctic Territory pre-dated the signing of the Antarctic Treaty, Australian laws that relate to Antarctica date from more than two decades before the Antarctic Treaty era. In terms of criminal law, the laws that apply to the Jervis Bay Territory (which follows the laws of the Australian Capital Territory) apply to the Australian Antarctic Territory. Key Australian legislation applying Antarctic Treaty System decisions include the Antarctic Treaty Act 1960, the Antarctic Treaty (Environment Protection) Act 1980 and the Antarctic Marine Living Resources Conservation Act 1981.
The law of the United States, including certain criminal offenses by or against U.S. nationals, such as murder, may apply to areas not under jurisdiction of other countries. To this end, the United States now stations special deputy U.S. Marshals in Antarctica to provide a law enforcement presence.
Some U.S. laws directly apply to Antarctica. For example, the Antarctic Conservation Act, Public Law 95-541, 16 U.S.C. § 2401 et seq., provides civil and criminal penalties for the following activities, unless authorized by regulation or statute:
- the taking of native Antarctic mammals or birds
- the introduction into Antarctica of non-indigenous plants and animals
- entry into specially protected or scientific areas
- the discharge or disposal of pollutants into Antarctica or Antarctic waters
- the importation into the U.S. of certain items from Antarctica
Violation of the Antarctic Conservation Act carries penalties of up to US$10,000 in fines and one year in prison. The Departments of the Treasury, Commerce, Transportation, and the Interior share enforcement responsibilities. The Act requires expeditions from the U.S. to Antarctica to notify, in advance, the Office of Oceans and Polar Affairs of the State Department, which reports such plans to other nations as required by the Antarctic Treaty. Further information is provided by the Office of Polar Programs of the National Science Foundation.
In 2006, the New Zealand police reported that jurisdictional issues prevented them issuing warrants for potential American witnesses who were reluctant to testify during the Christchurch Coroner's investigation into the death by poisoning of Australian astrophysicist Rodney Marks at the South Pole base in May 2000. Dr. Marks died while wintering over at the United States' Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station located at the geographic South Pole. Prior to autopsy, the death was attributed to natural causes by the National Science Foundation and the contractor administering the base. However, an autopsy in New Zealand revealed that Dr. Marks died from methanol poisoning. The New Zealand Police launched an investigation. In 2006, frustrated by lack of progress, the Christchurch Coroner said that it was unlikely that Dr. Marks ingested the methanol knowingly, although there is no certainty that he died as the direct result of the act of another person. During media interviews, the police detective in charge of the investigation criticized the National Science Foundation and contractor Raytheon for failing to co-operate with the investigation.
South African law applies to all South African citizens in Antarctica, and they are subject to the jurisdiction of the
- Antarctic Treaty Secretariat
- Full Text of the Antarctic Treaty
- Original facsimile of Antarctic Treaty
- Australian Antarctic Territory
- National Science Foundation – Office of Polar Programs
- List of all Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings
- An Antarctic Solution for the Koreas San Diego Union-Tribune, August 25, 2005 (Both South Korea and North Korea are members of the Antarctic Treaty)
- Emblem of the Antarctic Treaty
- "The Antarctic Treaty" (PDF).
- "Antarctic Treaty" in The New Encyclopædia Britannica. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 15th edn., 1992, Vol. 1, p. 439.
- "Information about the Antarctic Treaty and how Antarctica is governed.". Polar Conservation Organisation. December 28, 2005. Retrieved February 6, 2011.
- Antarctic Treaty Secretariat
- "Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty: Parties". Archived from the original on April 22, 2009. Retrieved May 23, 2009.
- "Antarctic Treaty".
- "The Antarctic Treaty System: Introduction" (PDF).
- "Czech Republic: Succession to Antarctic Treaty".
- "Germany: Accession to Antarctic Treaty".
- "Papua New Guinea: Succession to Antarctic Treaty".
- "Russia: Ratification to Antarctic Treaty".
- "Slovakia: Succession to Antarctic Treaty".
- "Antarctic Treaty System (ATS)".
- Wright, Minturn, "The Ownership of Antarctica, Its Living and Mineral Resources", Journal of Law and the Environment 4 (1987).
- "Dronning Maud Land". Norwegian Polar Institute. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
Rapp, Ole Magnus (21 September 2015). "Norge utvider Dronning Maud Land helt frem til Sydpolen". Aftenposten (in Norwegian) (Oslo, Norway: Aftenposten). Retrieved 22 September 2015.
…formålet med anneksjonen var å legge under seg det landet som til nå ligger herreløst og som ingen andre enn nordmenn har kartlagt og gransket. Norske myndigheter har derfor ikke motsatt seg at noen tolker det norske kravet slik at det går helt opp til og inkluderer polpunktet.
- Jennifer Frakes, The Common Heritage of Mankind Principle and the Deep Seabed, Outer Space, and Antarctica: Will Developed and Developing Nations Reach a Compromise? Wisconsin International Law Journal. 2003; 21:409
- Australian Antarctic Division – Australian environmental law and guidelines
- Marshals and Antarctica
- Hotere, Andrea. "South Pole death file still open". Sunday Star Times, December 17, 2006. Retrieved on December 19, 2006.
- Deutsche Presse-Agentur. "Death of Australian astrophysicist an Antarctic whodunnit". Monstersandcritics.com, December 14, 2006. Retrieved on December 19, 2006.
- Chapman, Paul. "New Zealand Probes What May Be First South Pole Murder". The Daily Telegraph, (December 14, 2006), reprinted in The New York Sun (December 19, 2006). Retrieved on December 19, 2006.
- Booker, Jarrod. "South Pole scientist may have been poisoned". The New Zealand Herald, (December 14, 2006). Retrieved on December 19, 2006.
- "South Pole Death Mystery – Who killed Rodney Marks?" Sunday Star Times (January 21, 2007)
- Section 2 of the South African Citizens in Antarctica Act, No. 55 of 1962, as amended by the Environmental Laws Rationalisation Act, No. 51 of 1997.
- Antarctic Treaties Act, No. 60 of 1996.
- Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition (ASOC)
- Antarctic Protected Areas
- Arctic Council
- Multilateral treaty