Independent Police Conduct Authority

Independent Police Conduct Authority

The Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) is an independent body that considers complaints against the New Zealand Police and oversees their conduct. It derives its responsibility from the Independent Police Conduct Authority Act. Under section 12.1 of the Act, the Authority's functions are to receive complaints about the police employees, practice, policy, or procedure; investigate those complaints and make recommendations based on those investigations.

The Authority also monitors conditions of detention and treatment of detainees in Police custody. In this respect, the IPCA is one of several 'national preventive mechanisms' designated in 2007 under an amendment to the Crimes of Torture Act.[1] Other agencies with responsibility for monitoring places of detention include the Human Rights Commission, the Children's Commissioner and the Ombudsmen. Together, these agencies including the IPCA, have joint responsibility to uphold New Zealand's commitment to the Optional Protocol to the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Forms of Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment (OPCAT).

Contents

  • History 1
  • Membership 2
    • Investigators 2.1
    • Chair 2.2
  • Investigation of Complaints 3
  • Independence and effectiveness 4
  • Significant IPCA reports 5
  • See also 6
  • References 7

History

Prior to 1989, complaints against the Police were investigated internally. Following several years of debate about Police accountability, sparked in part by the role of Police during the 1981 South Africa rugby union tour of New Zealand, the Police Complaints Authority was established in 1989.[2] The Police Complaints Authority comprised a single person, the first Authority being High Court Judge Peter Quilliam. He was followed by High Court Judge John Jeffries and then by District Court Judge Ian Borrin. Because of its reliance on police to investigate themselves, the Authority was perceived as lacking independence.[2]Allan Galbraith, was appointed as the Authority's first Manager of Investigations in 2003 and held that position until 2010. He had been a member of the New Zealand Police for 37 years.[3]

In 2004, a number of historic sexual misconduct allegations dating from the 1980s were made against both serving and former police officers. During that year, Prime Minister Helen Clark announced a Commission would be established to carry out an independent investigation into the way in which the New Zealand Police had dealt with allegations of sexual assault.[4] The investigation was conducted by Dame Margaret Bazley and took three years. It reviewed 313 complaints of sexual assault against 222 police officers, including 141 in which Dame Margaret said the evidence was strong enough to warrant criminal charges or disciplinary action.[5]

Dame Margaret's inquiry identified the inadequacy of police investigations into misconduct by their own officers and recommended that a more independent body was needed. In November 2007, the Independent Police Conduct Authority was established to focus on more independent investigators.[2]

Membership

The current Authority has a Board with up to five members. One member serves as chairperson, and the chairperson must be a Judge or a retired Judge. From its inception, the Authority was headed by High Court Judge, Lowell Goddard.[6] In August 2010 Parliament appointed three new Board members to the Authority: Angela Hauk-Willis, a former deputy secretary of Treasury, with special responsibility for corporate governance, Maori responsiveness, and ethics and integrity; Dianne Macaskill chief executive and Chief Archivist at Archives New Zealand from 2001 to 2009; and Richard Woods, who from 1999 to 2006, was the director of the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service, and from 2008 was chairperson of the Environmental Risk Management Authority.[7]

In April 2012, Judge Sir , former chairman of the New Zealand Parole Board, was appointed Chair of the Independent Police Conduct Authority for a term of five years.[7] Soon after he took over, he said he wanted to see more of the watchdog's work opened to public scrutiny.[8]

Investigators

In 2013 the IPCA had only six investigators[9] but employs 25–30 full-time staff including analysts, legal advisors, communications and support staff.[10] The official website indicates that its current and former investigators have backgrounds in police and other investigative work in Australia, Canada, England, Scotland, New Zealand and other jurisdictions. Their collective experience includes investigation of homicides, organised crime, drug enforcement, fraud and corruption, terrorism, war crimes, and a wide range of other criminal conduct.

In February 2013, IPCA chairman Sir David Carruthers told Parliament's law and order committee that "In line with moves by its English counterpart, the authority is looking at employing investigators who are not former police officers to counter perceptions (that) inquiries are not completely independent".[11]

Chair

  • Hon. Justice Sir Peter Quilliam (1989 - 1992)
  • Hon. Justice Sir John Jeffries (1992 - 1997)
  • Judge Ian Borrin (2000 - 2007)
  • Hon. Justice Lowell Goddard QC (2007 - 2012)
  • Judge Sir David Carruthers KNZM (April 2012 - Present)

Investigation of Complaints

The Authority receives about 2000 complaints every year,[12] which it sorts using a five tier system of seriousness.[13] Due to a limited number of IPCA investigators, most complaints to the IPCA are not investigated by the Authority but are referred to the Police to investigate. However, the IPCA oversees the Police handling of these complaints, usually by conducting a review or audit of the Police investigation after it is completed.[14]

In cases involving fatalities or allegations of serious misconduct, the Authority conducts its own investigations.[6] It may also investigate incidents in which there is a significant public interest in having an independent investigation, for example when allegations are made against a senior Police officer.[15] If a complaint may lead to an officer being charged with a criminal offence, the Police are required to conduct an investigation, as the IPCA does not have the power to lay charges. However, the IPCA can conduct a parallel investigation, oversee or directing the Police investigation, or reviewing the Police investigation once it is completed.[15]

Police Association President Greg O'Connor in 2013 said the reason most complaints to the IPCA weren't investigated was because they were "frivolous" and made by "perennial complainers who complain about everything to everyone".[16]

Independence and effectiveness

The IPCA is independent from the New Zealand Police. It is not part of the Police and is required to make its findings based on the facts and the law. It does not answer to the Police or anyone else over those findings and in this sense, its independence is similar to that of a Court. The Authority's status as an independent Crown entity means that there is no political involvement in its operations.[14] Chair, Sir David Carruthers stated that he believes the IPCA should be able to conduct "own motion" investigations, similar to those conducted by the Ombudsman. He said there were stories in the media about police conduct and behaviour where the IPCA does not necessarily receive a formal complaint, meaning no independent investigation is conducted.[11]

The IPCA has no ability to prosecute police, and can only make recommendations, which the police are not obliged to follow.[17] In 2013, the (then) newly appointed head of the IPCA, Sir David Carruthers, said he was considering whether to recommend new powers of arrest and prosecution for the authority.[18] In does not make all its findings public. After an IPCA investigation, following a complaint from Mii Teokotaia of Tokoroa after she was arrested in the 2005, before the charges were dropped, the IPCA "deemed them not of sufficient public interest" to release the report, despite senior Police involvement.[19] The IPCA chairman said in February 2013 that the IPCA is now likely to reporting on all investigations unless there's an overwhelming private interest that's paramount."[11]

Concerns have been raised that the ICPA is slow to release reports, however in response to these concerns the IPCA stated "the IPCA takes great care with its investigations and releases its reports once it is fully satisfied they are thorough, accurate, balanced and complete. Justice will always be our priority over speed."[9] In February 2013, IPCA chairman Sir David Carruthers said he hoped to speed inquiries up acknowledging that it is "very cruel on everybody, families, victims and police officers too when investigations dragged on over years".[11]

Significant IPCA reports

Deaths from police pursuits:In 2009, the IPCA released a report which found that out of 137 recent chases, only 31 were started because of known criminal activity.[20] The IPCA recommended that the decision to pursue be based on known facts, rather than general suspicion or speculation about the offender and suggested police make "the risk to public safety from not stopping an offender" the main consideration, however Police have chosen not to implement this recommendation.[21] After the deaths of three people in a police pursuit in 2012, the IPCA recommended that pursuit policy would should require officers to "state a reason for beginning a pursuit." It also recommended compulsory alcohol and drug testing of police officers involved in fatal incidents.[22]

Police involved shootings: The IPCA is required to investigate all police shootings and has found that in all seven Police shootings in the past ten years, that Police were lawfully justified in using lethal force to defend themselves.[23]

Child abuse cases: In 2011, the IPCA released a report on the outcome of its Inquiry into Police handling of child abuse cases which began in August 2009. This followed a Police report in 2008 which found widespread failings in management of child abuse cases in the Wairarapa District. Those failings included poor case management and workload management, poor supervision, and a lack of accountability and responsibility. Submissions were sought, and the Authority conducted an audit of child abuse cases throughout New Zealand, investigating individual complaints about Police responses to child abuse allegations. The IPCA chairman, Justice Lowell Goddard, said the scale of the inquiry had been unprecedented for the Authority and concluded "there were serious failures in the Police investigation of child abuse, which must never be repeated". The IPCA made 34 recommendations. The Police responded positively, and Commissioner Howard Broad established a Child Protection Implementation Project Team that has since led substantial changes to Police policies, practices, and procedures.[24]

Deaths in police custody: In June 2012 the IPCA released a comprehensive report on deaths in police custody between 2000 and 2010. The report revealed there had been 27 such deaths in the last ten years and raised serious concerns about inadequate risk assessment procedures used by police. Following their review, the IPCA made 20 recommendations, including better training being provided to officers about the dangers associated with restraining people in a prone position with their hands tied behind their back and that detainees who are unconscious or semi-conscious and cannot answer questions and/or physically look after themselves "must be taken to hospital".[25]

Treatment of teenagers in police cells: In October 2012, the Authority issued a report on the treatment of teenagers held in police cells following reports in January 2012 about two young girls who were detained and strip-searched by Upper Hutt police.[26] The IPCA launched a wider investigation which found that the number of youths being held in police cells has more than doubled since 2009.[27] It said that "youths in crisis are being locked up in police cells and denied their human rights." Police practices that "are, or risk being, inconsistent with accepted human rights" include: being held in solitary confinement; having cell lights on 24 hours a day; family members being prevented access; and not being allowed to see the doctor when they have medical or mental health problems.[28] The IPCA made 24 recommendations into how police can improve the detention and treatment of young people in custody.[29]

Urewera raids: In May 2013, the IPCA released its report into police action during the Urewera raids which occurred on 15 October 2007. It said police were justified in undertaking the operation but police acted illegally when they entered the homes of people who were not suspects and gave them reason to think they were detained while their houses were searched.[30] The road blocks established by police at Ruatoki and Taneatua used to detain and search people were also "unlawful, unjustified and unreasonable". Chairman Sir David Carruthers said: "The authority recommends that police re-engage with Tuhoe and take appropriate steps to build bridges with the Ruatoki community."[31]

See also

References

  1. ^ Monitoring places of detention, IPCA website
  2. ^ a b c History, IPCA website
  3. ^ Allan Galbraith, IPCA website
  4. ^ New Zealand Police Commission of Inquiry, Police website
  5. ^ Police get 'culture change' hurry up, NZ Herald 7 January 2011
  6. ^ a b Former cop's job on line after abuse claim, Stuff website, 4 April 2010
  7. ^ a b People and structure, IPCA website
  8. ^ Editorial: IPCA must explain Parlane secrecy
  9. ^ a b Stress for police after 22 months and still no report
  10. ^ IPCA website, Work for the IPCA
  11. ^ a b c d Police watchdog wants ability to launch its own inquiries
  12. ^ Suspect's death prompts review
  13. ^ IPCA Annual Report 2011, p 17
  14. ^ a b Independence, IPCA website
  15. ^ a b What happens to your complaint? IPCA website
  16. ^ Most IPCA complaints 'frivolous' - police. 3 News NZ. 10 October 2013.
  17. ^ Trust in police hits new low survey shows, Stuff website 16 October 2012
  18. ^ Delay in police-raid inquiry 'an outrage' Stuff website 13 October 2012
  19. ^ Shamed cop given plum London job, Stuff website 23 October 2010
  20. ^ Police: 'No perfect solution' to pursuits Dominion Post 18 May 2013
  21. ^ The chase is still on, NZ Herald 25 November 2010
  22. ^ Officer should have stopped chase - IPCA, Dominion Post, 10 May, 2013
  23. ^ The details of each case are contained on the IPCA website.
  24. ^ Authority urges continued momentum for change in abuse investigations
  25. ^ Deaths in Police custody – lessons from a ten-year review, IPCA 30 June 2012
  26. ^ Police watchdog to look into teens' ordeal, Dominion Post, 3 October 2012
  27. ^ website Joint thematic review of young person's in police detention p 39
  28. ^ IPCA website Joint thematic review of young person's in police detention
  29. ^ Report: Troubled teens denied human rights, NZ Herald 23 October 2012
  30. ^ Editorial: Raids report offers lessons for the future NZ Herald 23 May 2013
  31. ^ Police acted 'unlawfully' during Urewera raids NZ Herald 22 May 2013